View Active Topics          Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts          Switch to Mobile

Discrepancies about the Moon Rocks

Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.

Discrepancies about the Moon Rocks

Postby Scepcop » 07 Feb 2010, 21:08

Apollo believers' attempt to portray the doctored photo that removed the "C" on the rock and on the floor as the original, have failed. With a little research, Jarrah White, who actually does his homework, uncovers the truth, that the "C" rock photo was the original one. Yet another point on his scoreboard against the Apollo defenders.

(Again please don't comment on this thread if you refuse to watch the videos)



“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29






Re: Disputed "C" rock on Moon proves to be original!

Postby Nostradamus » 27 Feb 2010, 13:51

Another video from a nut case. Jarrah White knows very little. Love to laugh at his videos. Sometimes funny. Sometimes about as funny as a sitcom (that means not).
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
User avatar
Nostradamus
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 14:08

Moon rock from Armstrong and Aldrin turns out to be fake

Postby Scepcop » 12 Oct 2010, 23:50

'Moon rock' given to Holland by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin turns out to be fake.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/spac ... -fake.html

Also, here is conclusive proof that the mainstream media lies and fabricates stories deliberately.



Description by Jarrah White:

"Last month I received quite a few emails informing me of the 2010 Australian Geographic Awards Night, where a piece of digitally remastered Apollo 11 moonwalk footage would be screened and Buzz Aldrin would attend as the guest of honor.

I purchased tickets and asked if it were possible to arrange an interview with Aldrin. The organizers couldn't arrange one, but invited me to attend the press conference the day before the awards ceremony.

During the conference I questioned Aldrin about the Dutch moon rock incident. In October 1969, during their goodwill tour, the Apollo 11 crew gave a moon rock to the then US Ambassador to the Netherlands, J. William Middendorf, who in turn presented it to former Dutch Prime Minister Willem Drees. Last year, the moon rock in question was proven to be a piece of petrified wood.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/spac ... -fake.html

It seems the Sydney Morning Herald jumped on my attendance, as on October 6 they released an article alleging that I was an antagonistic gate crasher who needed to be removed by security. These allegations are both false and libelous.
http://www.smh.com.au/national/the-diar ... 166a5.html

To prove that I was not an uninvited, antagonistic interloper or removed from the conference, I am releasing this video showing my invitation to the conference, my exchange with Aldrin and the last few minutes of footage showing that I stayed the whole way through."
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Disputed "C" rock on Moon proves to be original!

Postby caniswalensis » 13 Oct 2010, 03:36

This is shaky logic, the dutch rock turning out ot be petrified wood does not prove the moon landing is a hoax.

It has been forty years since it was given, and a mix-up could have occured in that length of time. The Apollo program actually gifted every nation on earth with a piece of the moon. Those moon rocks were examined and studied by many non-nasa scientists that agreed thay were from the moon.

Somewhat surprisingly, many of those rocks have since been lost due to mishap or regieme changes.

this is typical of how the moon hoaxers try to make their case. They try to pile up little bits of evidence that do not prove anything and then pretend that the pile proves something.

A piece of junk is a piece of junk. Alone or in a pile.
"It is proper for you to doubt ... do not go upon report ... do not go upon tradition ... do not go upon hear-say." ~ Buddha
caniswalensis
 
Posts: 208
Joined: 02 Jun 2010, 03:41

Re: Disputed "C" rock on Moon proves to be original!

Postby derrida » 13 Oct 2010, 05:00

....?
if the moon landing hoax was actually more popular.. lets say.. it was 60% of the population believed it was a hoax
then would you turn the other way just to be against the status quo
derrida
 
Posts: 308
Joined: 08 Oct 2010, 04:29

Re: Disputed "C" rock on Moon proves to be original!

Postby caniswalensis » 13 Oct 2010, 05:39

derrida wrote:....?
if the moon landing hoax was actually more popular.. lets say.. it was 60% of the population believed it was a hoax
then would you turn the other way just to be against the status quo

Who are you asking that of?
"It is proper for you to doubt ... do not go upon report ... do not go upon tradition ... do not go upon hear-say." ~ Buddha
caniswalensis
 
Posts: 208
Joined: 02 Jun 2010, 03:41

Re: Disputed "C" rock on Moon proves to be original!

Postby derrida » 13 Oct 2010, 06:11

scescop
it appears to me that sometimes he supports theories and guys only because they are against the status quo
derrida
 
Posts: 308
Joined: 08 Oct 2010, 04:29

Re: Disputed "C" rock on Moon proves to be original!

Postby caniswalensis » 13 Oct 2010, 06:32

derrida wrote:scescop
it appears to me that sometimes he supports theories and guys only because they are against the status quo

OK, Thank you for clarifying.
"It is proper for you to doubt ... do not go upon report ... do not go upon tradition ... do not go upon hear-say." ~ Buddha
caniswalensis
 
Posts: 208
Joined: 02 Jun 2010, 03:41

Re: Disputed "C" rock on Moon proves to be original!

Postby Scepcop » 13 Oct 2010, 16:54

derrida wrote:....?
if the moon landing hoax was actually more popular.. lets say.. it was 60% of the population believed it was a hoax
then would you turn the other way just to be against the status quo


No of course not. The moon landing thing is dubious. There is no question that SOME of the moon photos were altered and tampered with. There are many reasons to be skeptical of it. If it were real, we would have a moon base on there by now, like the film "2001: A Space Odyssey" predicted. Instead, we've forgotten how to go back, and keep making excuses not to.

Where is your skepticism?
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Discrepancies about the Moon Rocks

Postby Scepcop » 13 Oct 2010, 17:16

Btw, what do you think of the mainstream media in Australia fabricating a story like that? What does it say about them? Do you still trust them?

Why does the media do that? Do you all still think the media is a paragon of truth and integrity?
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Discrepancies about the Moon Rocks

Postby Scepcop » 13 Oct 2010, 17:27

Btw, Jarrah is working on a new series exposing the Moon Rocks. For now, you can see his videos last year about the Moon Rocks starting here:

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Disputed "C" rock on Moon proves to be original!

Postby Edx » 13 Oct 2010, 20:24

Scepcop wrote:If it were real, we would have a moon base on there by now, like the film "2001: A Space Odyssey" predicted. Instead, we've forgotten how to go back, and keep making excuses not to.


Huh? We have been "back" to the moon, several times. Six times, in fact. Not since 1972, but then we need a good reason to justify all the cost of it.

As for a base on the moon, this will happen, its just something that takes a lot of logistics to figure out. I'm sure plenty of scientists in this field would love a moon base, I expected they wanted that since they were kids. But just because we will be able to put a man on Mars fairly soon, when we actually do, it will be a whole other deal making an actual Mars base there. You have to justify such a lot of expense.

Also, surely if and when they do build a moon base you're still going to say it proves nothing because technology is better now. When they find the remains of the other landings you'll just say it was planted. I always find it funny when conspiracy theorists ask for these kinds of things when you just know if they were given everything they ever asked for what their excuses for rejecting it would be.

Where is your skepticism?


You need to learn what actual skepticism is, it isn't believing whatever crazy rubbish someone says just because its "out there" and unpopular in science. You seem to be so irrationally "skeptical" of everything apart from the people actually promoting these daft claims.
Edx
 
Posts: 128
Joined: 03 Jul 2010, 03:21

Re: Disputed "C" rock on Moon proves to be original!

Postby Arouet » 13 Oct 2010, 21:28

Scepcop wrote:No of course not. The moon landing thing is dubious. There is no question that SOME of the moon photos were altered and tampered with. There are many reasons to be skeptical of it. If it were real, we would have a moon base on there by now, like the film "2001: A Space Odyssey" predicted. Instead, we've forgotten how to go back, and keep making excuses not to.

Where is your skepticism?


Scepcop, do you honestly think we've forgotten how to get to the moon? They're planning to go to Mars after all (although from what I understand the current administration in the US is not crazy about it, so plans may be on hold). There's a whole book about it: http://www.amazon.com/Packing-Mars-Curi ... 0393068471. I haven't read it, though I've listened to a couple interviews with the author.

Also, why do you think we'd have a base on the moon by now? Just to do it? No matter what the cost? No matter whether there are good reasons to set up a base on the moon? What benefit is there currently to humanity in setting up a base on the moon? Is it safe? (ie; low gravity is not good for humans). Is it cost effective currently?

The establishment of a space elevator may also make such a project much more feasible.

Long and short of it: the fact that we don't have a colony on the moon is not evidence that we didn't go to the moon.
User avatar
Arouet
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 03:07

Re: Discrepancies about the Moon Rocks

Postby derrida » 13 Oct 2010, 22:22

i think scescop believes that if they faked the moon landing 6 times they can also fake the mars landing..
hey.. we have people living in space for months in the space station.. this week the virgin thing did the first travel without people it is just a matter of time of putting people on space (at least for 15 minutes).. how far the moon can be?
just think about it.. we do have the technology
derrida
 
Posts: 308
Joined: 08 Oct 2010, 04:29


Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest