Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.
13 posts • Page 1 of 1
The below website is from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA). It shows pictures taken from their spacecraft that flew 100 km above the surface of the moon at the landing site of Apollo 15. It not only shows the "halo effect" of the landing site, but 3D images detail exactly the terrain from photographs of the mission which would have been impossible if not taken from the moon itself.
I've heard arguments that the photos from NASA's LRO could be faked since they were taken by NASA itself, but these photos were taken by a Japanese aircraft who would like nothing better but to prove the US did not land on the moon.
Hoaxer Theorists, please provide some kind of rational explanation that could continue to support this theory.
Think of yourself on a nice, sandy beach. Jump off the lifeguard stand and land, then climb back up the stand. Look down. That pile of displaced sand where you originally landed is the "halo."
C'mon now Ninja. You've left a picture of yourself in my mind where you look just like Pamela Anderson on Baywatch, just way smarter. Don't ruin it by saying you'd break a hip as that makes me think you look more like Cloris Leachman.
Good question ProfWag.
First, I'm not a moon hoaxer, nor an apollo believer. My position is that there are VALID REASONS for doubting the moon landing, but I am not 100 percent convinced either way whether they were real or not.
I am not an expert in this complicated subject either.
But to answer your question, I refer you to Jarrah White's videos about the Halo and JAXA and all that. He analyzes them in great depth and compares side by side photos and draws logical analyses. He's done his homework. So regardless of whether you agree with him or not, you should at least give him respect for all the hundreds of hours he's put into this.
Here is his ten part video entitled "MoonFaker - The Halo Addendum". I'm sorry that it is ten parts and hence 100 minutes, and you can only stomach so much, but what can I say? Give it a watch please. Here is part one of ten:
Btw, here is a preliminary analysis video, if you don't have the time to watch that ten part video on the halo.
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
of course not
reputable scientists are "conventional"
and scescop likes those that arent conventional
(which in some cases includes some loonies)
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
I believe you may be on to something here ciscop. Jarrah, Richard Gage, etc. that he keeps wanting people watch their videos, all seem to be rather unconventional.
13 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests