View Active Topics          Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts          Switch to Mobile

Moon Hoaxers Please Explain

Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.

Moon Hoaxers Please Explain

Postby ProfWag » 05 Feb 2010, 23:42

The below website is from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA). It shows pictures taken from their spacecraft that flew 100 km above the surface of the moon at the landing site of Apollo 15. It not only shows the "halo effect" of the landing site, but 3D images detail exactly the terrain from photographs of the mission which would have been impossible if not taken from the moon itself.
I've heard arguments that the photos from NASA's LRO could be faked since they were taken by NASA itself, but these photos were taken by a Japanese aircraft who would like nothing better but to prove the US did not land on the moon.
Hoaxer Theorists, please provide some kind of rational explanation that could continue to support this theory.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2008/05/20080520_kaguya_e.html
Thanks
Wag
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54






Re: Moon Hoaxers Please Explain

Postby NinjaPuppy » 06 Feb 2010, 02:51

Gee, I'd love to but first you will have to explain to me what a 'halo' is.
User avatar
NinjaPuppy
 
Posts: 4002
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 20:44

Re: Moon Hoaxers Please Explain

Postby ProfWag » 06 Feb 2010, 02:57

NinjaPuppy wrote:Gee, I'd love to but first you will have to explain to me what a 'halo' is.

Think of yourself on a nice, sandy beach. Jump off the lifeguard stand and land, then climb back up the stand. Look down. That pile of displaced sand where you originally landed is the "halo."
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: Moon Hoaxers Please Explain

Postby NinjaPuppy » 06 Feb 2010, 03:12

With my luck I would break a hip.

Thanks for the explanation. It's what I thought it was but I'm just not seeing it in those pics.
User avatar
NinjaPuppy
 
Posts: 4002
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 20:44

Re: Moon Hoaxers Please Explain

Postby ProfWag » 06 Feb 2010, 03:16

NinjaPuppy wrote:With my luck I would break a hip.


C'mon now Ninja. You've left a picture of yourself in my mind where you look just like Pamela Anderson on Baywatch, just way smarter. Don't ruin it by saying you'd break a hip as that makes me think you look more like Cloris Leachman.
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: Moon Hoaxers Please Explain

Postby NinjaPuppy » 06 Feb 2010, 03:21

Hey, I may be ravishingly beautiful on the outside but I'm still old on the inside. Actually I am a dead ringer for what's her name.... ?
User avatar
NinjaPuppy
 
Posts: 4002
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 20:44

Re: Moon Hoaxers Please Explain

Postby ProfWag » 06 Feb 2010, 03:27

NinjaPuppy wrote:Hey, I may be ravishingly beautiful on the outside but I'm still old on the inside. Actually I am a dead ringer for what's her name.... ?

Sylvia Browne?
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: Moon Hoaxers Please Explain

Postby NinjaPuppy » 06 Feb 2010, 03:29

:cry:
User avatar
NinjaPuppy
 
Posts: 4002
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 20:44

Re: Moon Hoaxers Please Explain

Postby Scepcop » 07 Feb 2010, 21:36

Good question ProfWag.

First, I'm not a moon hoaxer, nor an apollo believer. My position is that there are VALID REASONS for doubting the moon landing, but I am not 100 percent convinced either way whether they were real or not.

I am not an expert in this complicated subject either.

But to answer your question, I refer you to Jarrah White's videos about the Halo and JAXA and all that. He analyzes them in great depth and compares side by side photos and draws logical analyses. He's done his homework. So regardless of whether you agree with him or not, you should at least give him respect for all the hundreds of hours he's put into this.

Here is his ten part video entitled "MoonFaker - The Halo Addendum". I'm sorry that it is ten parts and hence 100 minutes, and you can only stomach so much, but what can I say? Give it a watch please. Here is part one of ten:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsMzMsshZx4

Btw, here is a preliminary analysis video, if you don't have the time to watch that ten part video on the halo.

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Moon Hoaxers Please Explain

Postby ProfWag » 08 Feb 2010, 23:04

Just curious before I delve deep into the Boy Genius, are there any reputable scientists who support Jarrah's theory?
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: Moon Hoaxers Please Explain

Postby ciscop » 09 Feb 2010, 05:05

ProfWag wrote:Just curious before I delve deep into the Boy Genius, are there any reputable scientists who support Jarrah's theory?


of course not
reputable scientists are "conventional"
and scescop likes those that arent conventional
(which in some cases includes some loonies)
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
User avatar
ciscop
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: 22 Jul 2009, 12:04

Re: Moon Hoaxers Please Explain

Postby ProfWag » 09 Feb 2010, 11:00

ciscop wrote:
ProfWag wrote:Just curious before I delve deep into the Boy Genius, are there any reputable scientists who support Jarrah's theory?


of course not
reputable scientists are "conventional"
and scescop likes those that arent conventional
(which in some cases includes some loonies)

I believe you may be on to something here ciscop. Jarrah, Richard Gage, etc. that he keeps wanting people watch their videos, all seem to be rather unconventional.
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: Moon Hoaxers Please Explain

Postby Nostradamus » 26 Feb 2010, 23:22

Jarrah begins with a fallacy - only 1 light source. Let me give you a hint. Ever been out on a moon lit night?
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
User avatar
Nostradamus
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 14:08


Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron