ProfWag wrote:stundie wrote:Challenge met hopefully.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/23319117/NORA ... -Procedure
I will freely admit stundie, that THAT was a valiant effort! Kudos to you! However, as ND aluded to, almost all military instructions are revisions of old instructions. If it is a revision, there is a summary of changes. As you can see from this document, paragraph 7 is a listing of the summary of changes which are:
7. Summary of Changes
a. Unmanned vehicles (UAV, ROV) added to the description of
possible derelict airborne objects.
b. Statutory Authority for Responding to Aircraft Piracy enclosure
removed and added to reference list.
c. In various places throughout the document, “USELEMNORAD” was
replaced with “NORAD.”
d. FAA Order 7610.4J, 3 November 1998, “Special Military
Operations,” was added as a reference
These really don't sound to me like neither Chaney nor Rumsfeld changed much of anything relating to the shooting down commercial airliners, but one may see something different than I. The fact that this CJCSI was updated 3 months prior to 9/11 sure does make for a good conspiracy story though!
It sure does make for a good conspiracy story but not as good a story as the Halloween Massacre.