A Challenge to Scepcop
63 posts
• Page 2 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Re: A Challenge to ScepcopI am sure that you can probably quote these definitions better than Wikipedia but for those who are reading along at home (lurkers) I wanted to make sure that we had the actual descriptions and definitions spelled out.
Re: A Challenge to ScepcopScimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: A Challenge to ScepcopOh my goodness. A simple statement typed in response to my anger about this whole 9/11 thing is starting to take on a different course than I had intended. Bottom line for me to clarify, I believe that virtually every post Sceopcop has presented as evidence of a conspiracy on 9/11 was not fact-checked prior to posting. I believe that his sources are not valid and many of the people that he uses as a source of information are not experts and probably have an agenda or reason for spreading misinformation. That's really all I meant my my previous post. It's one thing to question something, which I encourage, but once the answer is shown, then one should move on to something else rather than twist and turn it to fit a belief.
Re: A Challenge to ScepcopScimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: A Challenge to ScepcopNo offense taken Ninja. How could I get upset with you?
It's these other posts that people may stumble upon and with just one side of a topic shown, wouldn't be aware of the rest of the story. On a topic like 9/11, it's vitally important that people look at all sides of a story, and not just a youtube video from a potentially unreliable source, and make up their own minds to answer any questions they may have.
Re: A Challenge to Scepcopso is there´s gonna be a time limit for this?
i wonder how scescop plans to battle shermer (or anyone) at dragoncon is his plan just to say a lot of random $%·"· and quote his own antiskepticism manifesto? thats gonna be uglier than the Texas chainsaw massacre... For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: A Challenge to ScepcopNot to derail this topic but I recently heard an interview with Shermer on 'Ghost Divas' and that man is really good on his feet. I was going to post a link but the first 20+ minutes of this show has nothing to do with Shermer and I never got to listen all the way through, so it wasn't fully tested for accuracy.
Re: A Challenge to ScepcopSince Scepcop's back in this thread again (but who knows for how long), I thought I should bump this up in case he missed it. Still waiting and we're on day 10 for him to counter my claim that he posts false and misleading information.
Re: A Challenge to Scepcopscescop???? scescooooop???
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: A Challenge to Scepcopciscop you constantly crack me up. thanks
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: A Challenge to ScepcopFor every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
63 posts
• Page 2 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests |
|