Page 1 of 1

Skeptics, are these credible critics to you?

PostPosted: 07 Nov 2009, 03:20
by Scepcop
http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html

CREDIBLE CRITICS OF THE OFFICIAL ACCOUNT OF 9/11

41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11 – Official Account of 9/11: “Terribly Flawed,” “Laced with Contradictions,” “a Joke,” “a Cover-up”
May 18, 2009 English PDF English HTML Danish PDF
French PDF German PDF Greek PDF Norwegian PDF
Polish PDF Swedish PDF

29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11 – More than 900 Architects and Engineers have joined call for new investigation, faulting official collapse reports
June 17, 2009 PDF

Respected Medical Professionals Launch New 9/11 Truth Group – Announces Online Petition Calling for New Investigation
Feb. 24, 2009 MS Word Article on OpEdNews

Twenty-five U.S. Military Officers Challenge Official Account of 9/11 – Official Account of 9/11 “Impossible”, “A Bunch of Hogwash”, “Total B.S.”, “Ludicrous”, “A Well-Organized Cover-up”, “A White-Washed Farce”
Jan. 14, 2008 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews

Eight U.S. State Department Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11 – Official Account of 9/11 "Flawed", "Absurd", "Totally Inadequate", "a Cover-up"
Jan. 5, 2008 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews

Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11 Investigation – Official Account of 9/11 "Impossible", "Hogwash", "Fatally Flawed"
Dec. 13, 2007 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews

Eight Senior Republican Administration Appointees Challenge Official Account of 9/11 – "Not Possible", "a Whitewash", "False"
Dec. 4, 2007 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews

Re: Skeptics, are these credible critics to you?

PostPosted: 07 Nov 2009, 05:55
by ciscop
i would like them to show proof of that CT

but then again
all you have is smoke and mirrors
and a lot of people you think are credible experts because you fancy their theories

i still dont see why this is paranormal

Re: Skeptics, are these credible critics to you?

PostPosted: 07 Nov 2009, 06:55
by Scepcop
ciscop wrote:i would like them to show proof of that CT

but then again
all you have is smoke and mirrors
and a lot of people you think are credible experts because you fancy their theories

i still dont see why this is paranormal


This is not about the paranormal, it's about conspiracies. Duh. Why do you ask obvious questions?

Show proof? They have. The ae911truth.org site shows plenty of proof. Problem is your closed minded dismissiveness that is not about truth or logic.

Re: Skeptics, are these credible critics to you?

PostPosted: 07 Nov 2009, 11:01
by Nostradamus
Wow you got about 100 people at most assuming no one signed up for multiple lists. How unimpressive.

Besides, ciscop asks for proof and all you do is protest without providing anything.