SCEPCOP Forum

ProfWag and Nostradamus,
Can you explain why Building 7 fell with no resistance below it? How can so much steel and concrete become like air? Where is the resistance of all that material?

SCEPCOP - Thanks for that video. I will still argue the term 'pull it' especially as to the phone call to some controlled demolition company. She states that 'pull it' means when they actually pull it down. I take that to mean as 'pull it down manually with heavy equipment'. It's ashame that the caller didn't bother to ask a few more questions while he was at it. Not to mention that he might have but none of us have any way of verifying this. Those YouTube videos don't pack enough punch for me to form an opinion as they are generally presented in the opinion of the maker. For all we know, that person could have made a hundred calls and only used the one clip with the answer that he wanted to hear.

This is one of my many reasons for wanting further investigation into so many things that happened that day. However, in light of the fact that not one of us can change the facts that thousands of people died that day, I'd really rather see more energy go into preventing something like this from ever happening again. I will always feel that someone was 'sleeping on the switch'. Spending so much time in debating a landlord's words during the most horrific time in US history is pale by comparison to asking if our government knew anything of this prior to it happening, how much they knew, and why they couldn't prevent it. Next, if they knew nothing or very little about it, I ask, "why" again? I still can't believe that 19 terrorists with a death wish in their zeal for the chance of 72 virgins, could pull this off without some pretty extensive help. That is, and may always be, the reason that makes me wonder about so many of the unanswered questions about 9/11.

Meanwhile, we have probably as many opinions about 9/11 as we do people. Each with a 'little spin' on the events of that horrible day. An official report has been filed and some will take it as gospel and some will argue every sentence in that report.

I watched the video. Love the way that they jump back and forth between versions of the NIST report to claim discrepancies. Typical hogwash.

And finally to Scepcop, the madrid fire involved a building that was a very different construction than the WTC buildings. If you do a little research instead of tossing out "cocktail party lines" you will learn why it is important to build structures as was done in the madrid high rise instead of the way the WTC buildings were built.