A Challenge to Conspiracy Theorists

[ProfWag]

Okay, there has been a lot of hashing, rebutting, and rehashing over the months in this "Paranormal" forum (?) concerning the events of 9/11. So, in order to regain some form of sanity in this discussion, I offer a challenge. My claim is that the World Trade Centers 1, 2, & 7 as well as the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsylvania were the responsibility of 19 hijackers. My stance is that a plane hit the Pentagon and that there was no "controlled demolition" that occured at any of the WTC buildings. My belief is that the US government, as well as other country's governments probably had (and have) more information than they have shared on potential terrorist attacks prior to 9/11, but they did all they could do to prevent it in the interest of national security.
My challenge is this. Please provide one piece of evidence that cannot be fairly criticized to prove there was a conspiracy. Please don't provide videos, but just one simple, hard piece of evidence that is concrete and would make a logical person re-think their stance. If your evidence is from a video, then please just print out what was said and by whom. I want to keep this simple.
Thanks
Wag

[WhiteTiger]

Well now, whether and how I answer is going to be dependent on just how "simple" you're aiming for. With a modest bit of effort to dig up some specs, I can call into serious question the entire "planes and jet fuel fire did it" scenario, but I'm not going to take the trouble to assemble the data, formulae and calculations with explanations of their relevance and meanings if what you're asking for is just "logical argument". If I do it I'm gonna "show my work", so if engineering terminology and calculations are beyond the scope of your purpose let me know, please.



Tiger

[Nostradamus]

Excellent white tiger. Looking forward to reading your posts.

[ProfWag]

[WhiteTiger]

Fair enough. Let me consider this a bit since it isn't cut and dried; nostradamus has voiced an interest in the technical discussion, but based on your reply this may well exceed your intent here since it can't really be effectively skimmed or condensed. Since it's an engineering problem it has to be presented as a whole to state the argument accurately, and that will easily span several largish posts.

It's your thread and I don't want to do a hijack even inadvertently. Btw, I'm an old forum and chatroom hand... I fully expect anything, regardless how sound, to be questioned if it carries the slightest cache of controversy



Tiger

[NinjaPuppy]

[ProfWag]

[ProfWag]

[NinjaPuppy]

[ProfWag]

[accidentsinspace]

High ranking officials that say 9/11 was a LIE.
http://patriotsquestion911.com/

[NinjaPuppy]

[ProfWag]

[accidentsinspace]

[ProfWag]