View Active Topics          Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts          Switch to Mobile

Griffin debunks the 9/11 phone calls with facts and science

Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.

Griffin debunks the 9/11 phone calls with facts and science

Postby Scepcop » 26 Aug 2009, 23:50

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29






Re: Griffin debunks the 9/11 phone calls with facts and science

Postby ProfWag » 27 Aug 2009, 01:07

Scepcop wrote:

Now you're going to throw in a retired Bible teacher as an expert in 9/11?
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: Griffin debunks the 9/11 phone calls with facts and science

Postby Scepcop » 27 Aug 2009, 01:38

ProfWag wrote:
Scepcop wrote:

Now you're going to throw in a retired Bible teacher as an expert in 9/11?


He is an expert in 9/11. He wrote many books about it and is considered one of the top experts on 9/11.

You have a problem with that?

He is far above you and does not BS like you do.

His presentation is factual, logical, scientific and he has a lot of integrity.
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Griffin debunks the 9/11 phone calls with facts and science

Postby ProfWag » 27 Aug 2009, 01:46

Scepcop wrote:
ProfWag wrote:
Scepcop wrote:

Now you're going to throw in a retired Bible teacher as an expert in 9/11?


He is an expert in 9/11. He wrote many books about it and is considered one of the top experts on 9/11.

You have a problem with that?

He is far above you and does not BS like you do.

His presentation is factual, logical, scientific and he has a lot of integrity.

You just crack me up Mr. Wu. Factual? No. Logical? No. Scientific? No. Integrity? I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and say Yes.
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: Griffin debunks the 9/11 phone calls with facts and science

Postby Scepcop » 27 Aug 2009, 01:56

Who are you to say he's not factual? What are your qualifications? You saying so doesnt' make it so. You can look at the blue sky and say it isn't blue, and that doesn't change reality.

Prove something that he said that's wrong. You can't. You just BS. All you have are WORDS, not facts.

You are wasting everyone's time.
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Griffin debunks the 9/11 phone calls with facts and science

Postby ciscop » 27 Aug 2009, 04:32

Scepcop wrote:Who are you to say he's not factual? What are your qualifications? You saying so doesnt' make it so. You can look at the blue sky and say it isn't blue, and that doesn't change reality.

Prove something that he said that's wrong. You can't. You just BS. All you have are WORDS, not facts.

You are wasting everyone's time.


well..
if he was indeed a bible teacher
i am pretty sure he isnt factual

why you care so much about 911?
is it considered paranormal?
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
User avatar
ciscop
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: 22 Jul 2009, 12:04

Re: Griffin debunks the 9/11 phone calls with facts and science

Postby Nostradamus » 31 Aug 2009, 09:00

He is an expert in 9/11. He wrote many books about it and is considered one of the top experts on 9/11.

You have a problem with that?

He is far above you and does not BS like you do.

His presentation is factual, logical, scientific and he has a lot of integrity.


His presentation about the calls is wrong. He knows it. He has publicly stated that he was wrong about calls. Why continue to present him on this issue in light of that fact that his evidence was complete junk and it took him a few years to realize that he was completely wrong.
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
User avatar
Nostradamus
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 14:08


Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 3 guests