WTC7 - The smoking gun in 9/11 conspiracy

[Scepcop]

Russia Today reports that new photos reveal that WTC was exploded from the inside.

[Arouet]

[Scepcop]

Check out this awesome new music video by Martin Noakes about 9/11 and Building 7. It's very well done and beautifully sung.

[NinjaPuppy]

[ProfWag]

[quote="Scepcop"]Russia Today reports that new photos reveal that WTC was exploded from the inside.

Scepcop, could you agree that it was NOT Russia Today that is reporting "new" photos, but rather it was this dude from the CT website wearechange.org that is making the statements? There is a HUGE difference between Russia Today reporting it and RT giving some dude some airtime.

[ProfWag]

[Craig Browning]

Winston's addiction to conspiracy theories and other such rhetoric is at times a pain, but to disrespect a day that's been set aside by the MAJORITY of the U.S. if not the world to remember and honor the fallen, to embrace the beginning of a new start in life and to simply be free of the BULL SHIT for a little while... it's an all time low.

As I stated in his other thread, YOU'RE A DICK WINSTON!

This isn't "cute" and it's far from being remotely honorable.

[Scepcop]

Here is a video of the ground under the WTC shaking, 12 seconds before its collapse. Isn't this obvious evidence of some kind of underground detonation device?

[Scepcop]

[Scepcop]

ProfWag, you have no case.

- Thermite residue and iron microspheres have been found in the WTC dust. This is HARD SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE of artificial explosives. Don't you believe in science? Or are you all about superstition, propaganda, and mind control?

- There is no way that a small chunk of the WTC could plummet through the main portion of it, 80,000 tons of steel, like thin air, at near free fall. That is 100 percent impossible. Even a child knows that. It's common sense, which you've thrown out the window.

- Thousands of people from all walks of life heard explosions at the ground level of the WTC, just before the collapse. Some even heard them BEFORE the planes hit. The simple explanation is that explosives were used or detonated, probably under the base of the WTC. You have never explained that. All you do is deny them. That makes you dishonest and pointless to even debate with.

- Never before or after 9/11, have steel high rises collapsed from fire. Fire deforms a building gradually, and unevenly. You can't escape that. It does not demolish a skyscraper in seconds. Nor does it pulverize concrete to dust. That is a fact. You could pour kerosene all over the WTC and light it on fire, and the steel STILL wouldn't melt or even weaken. Only a deluded person totally out of touch with reality would deny that. If fire could do that, then the demolition company would be out of business and there would be no need to spend months rigging a building with explosives. Common sense. Even children know this. AE911Truth.org's qualified engineers and welders have tested fire's effect on steel, and found this to be true.

All lines of evidence say you are 100 percent wrong ProfWag. You simply can't accept reality cause it's too disturbing for you, so you emotionally block it.

[ProfWag]

[craig weiler]

This is an interesting discussion, and I can't contribute anything factual to it, but I'd like to offer the following: The main problem I have with such theories is that whether you can prove them or not, nothing will come of it. It's the same problem I have with UFO's. What I believe makes no difference whatsoever. Unless ET's actually make themselves known publicly, there will be no consensus and that is completely beyond anyone's reach.

So my question is: given that all this is true, what can possibly be accomplished? It's not like the secrets will ever come out, if they're there.

[Scepcop]

[ProfWag]

[ProfWag]