View Active Topics          Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts          Switch to Mobile

http://www.debunking911.com

Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.

Re: http://www.debunking911.com

Postby Scepcop » 26 Aug 2009, 07:33

ProfWag wrote:What reference do you have that says the FBI has footage that has not been made public?
And no, in the interest of national security, you do not have the right to always know things that are classified. Assuming for a moment that they FBI does have additional footage, then would that not give away where their security cameras are located? Personally, if I still worked in D.C., I would not want you or anyone else to know where they are located for my own safety.


Uh ProfWag, it's well known that there are 86 videos that the FBI is withholding. How can you not know that? It's common knowledge within the 9/11 movements on both sides.

http://www.flight77.info/85videos.html
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29






Re: http://www.debunking911.com

Postby ProfWag » 27 Aug 2009, 00:01

Scepcop wrote:
ProfWag wrote:What reference do you have that says the FBI has footage that has not been made public?
And no, in the interest of national security, you do not have the right to always know things that are classified. Assuming for a moment that they FBI does have additional footage, then would that not give away where their security cameras are located? Personally, if I still worked in D.C., I would not want you or anyone else to know where they are located for my own safety.


Uh ProfWag, it's well known that there are 86 videos that the FBI is withholding. How can you not know that? It's common knowledge within the 9/11 movements on both sides.

http://www.flight77.info/85videos.html

LMAO!!! Oh my god Scepcop, once again you made me laugh so hard that I pee'd my pants! Quit doing that! I asked earlier on how it was known that the FBI was withholding video of the plane crashing into the Pentagon. You then tried to make a mockery out of me by saying how well known it is, etc. that there are 86 (sic-it's actually 85) videos and you referred me to the above website. So, I went there ('cause I like to checkup on references). You know what you led me too? This:
•She determined that the FBI had 85 videotaptes that might be relevant. Of those, 56 "of these videotapes did not show either the Pentagon building, the Pentagon crash site, or the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11."
•Of the 29 remaining videotapes, 16 "did not show the Pentagon crash site and did not show the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon."
•Of the 13 remaining tapes which showed the Pentagon crash site, 12 "only showed after the impact of Flight 77."
•The videotape taken from the Citgo gas station did not show the impact.
•No videotapes were located from the Sheraton Hotel, though she located a videotape from the Doubletree Hotel.

You just crack me up Scepcop! As I said on an earlier post, you don't check your references so your comments are not taken seriously! Also, when you go back to that website you sent me, click on the "debris" link and you'll see all sorts of pictures of a commercial airliner.
So, one last time, how do you know there is video footage that is being withheld of an airliner crasing into the Pentagon?
So, Mr. Wu, you rascal, c'mon, make this a challenging debate!!!!!
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: http://www.debunking911.com

Postby ProfWag » 27 Aug 2009, 05:51

ProfWag wrote:
Scepcop wrote:
ProfWag wrote:What reference do you have that says the FBI has footage that has not been made public?
And no, in the interest of national security, you do not have the right to always know things that are classified. Assuming for a moment that they FBI does have additional footage, then would that not give away where their security cameras are located? Personally, if I still worked in D.C., I would not want you or anyone else to know where they are located for my own safety.


Uh ProfWag, it's well known that there are 86 videos that the FBI is withholding. How can you not know that? It's common knowledge within the 9/11 movements on both sides.

http://www.flight77.info/85videos.html

LMAO!!! Oh my god Scepcop, once again you made me laugh so hard that I pee'd my pants! Quit doing that! I asked earlier on how it was known that the FBI was withholding video of the plane crashing into the Pentagon. You then tried to make a mockery out of me by saying how well known it is, etc. that there are 86 (sic-it's actually 85) videos and you referred me to the above website. So, I went there ('cause I like to checkup on references). You know what you led me too? This:
•She determined that the FBI had 85 videotaptes that might be relevant. Of those, 56 "of these videotapes did not show either the Pentagon building, the Pentagon crash site, or the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11."
•Of the 29 remaining videotapes, 16 "did not show the Pentagon crash site and did not show the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon."
•Of the 13 remaining tapes which showed the Pentagon crash site, 12 "only showed after the impact of Flight 77."
•The videotape taken from the Citgo gas station did not show the impact.
•No videotapes were located from the Sheraton Hotel, though she located a videotape from the Doubletree Hotel.

You just crack me up Scepcop! As I said on an earlier post, you don't check your references so your comments are not taken seriously! Also, when you go back to that website you sent me, click on the "debris" link and you'll see all sorts of pictures of a commercial airliner.
So, one last time, how do you know there is video footage that is being withheld of an airliner crasing into the Pentagon?
So, Mr. Wu, you rascal, c'mon, make this a challenging debate!!!!!

Oh, and one more thing Mr. Wu! You didn't comment on this. Why not? You said it was common knowledge all those tapes are out there, but that doesn't appear to be the case. Care to comment on this misunderstanding or would you rather throw insults around like an 6-year old child.
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Previous

Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron