View Active Topics          View Your Posts
Switch to desktop style
Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.
Post a reply

3 scientific journals publish thermite evidence in WTC dust!

22 Aug 2009, 23:07

According to whistleblower Kevin Ryan, his scientific papers on active thermite residue in the WTC dust have now been published in THREE mainstream peer reviewed scientific journals!

Here is one of them, from which you can download a PDF copy of, in a peer reviewed scientific journal.

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/conte ... 7TOCPJ.SGM

Abstract

We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.

Keywords: JScanning electron microscopy, X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy, Differential scanning calorimetry, DSC analysis, World Trade Center, WTC dust, 9/11, Iron-rich microspheres, Thermite, Super-thermite, Energetic nanocomposites, Nano-thermite
Affiliation: Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark.

Re: 3 scientific journals publish thermite evidence in WTC dust!

22 Aug 2009, 23:19

Scepcop, you continuing saga to try to prove 9/11 was more than terrists is really starting to get to me and I won't stand for it. You have not once tried to show the factual data, you only continue to spread rumors and propaganda. I will be posting the facts later in the day. Your actions are uncalled for.

Re: 3 scientific journals publish thermite evidence in WTC dust!

22 Aug 2009, 23:46

ProfWag wrote:Scepcop, you continuing saga to try to prove 9/11 was more than terrists is really starting to get to me and I won't stand for it. You have not once tried to show the factual data, you only continue to spread rumors and propaganda. I will be posting the facts later in the day. Your actions are uncalled for.


think you had better go watch that 2 hour video first prof - you MAY just want to reconsider ..................... ;)

Re: 3 scientific journals publish thermite evidence in WTC dust!

23 Aug 2009, 11:51

ProfWag wrote:Scepcop, you continuing saga to try to prove 9/11 was more than terrists is really starting to get to me and I won't stand for it. You have not once tried to show the factual data, you only continue to spread rumors and propaganda. I will be posting the facts later in the day. Your actions are uncalled for.


Uh dude, are you blind? In this thread I just gave you the link to download a SCIENTIFIC peer reviewed paper published in a SCIENTIFIC journal describing the active thermite residue in the WTC dust!

How the hell can you call that a "rumour"??????? Are you playing devil's advocate here, or are your comprehension skills below average? How the hell can you be teaching in college???? Are you that much in denial? Sheesh.

Go DOWNLOAD it! It's a 10 MB file with clear photos and scientific analysis. Click below. Then click the download link. You have your "factual data".

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/conte ... 7TOCPJ.SGM

Why is it that I have to repeat the most obvious things with you skeptics? It's annoying!

Re: 3 scientific journals publish thermite evidence in WTC dust!

23 Aug 2009, 11:57

brett wrote:
ProfWag wrote:Scepcop, you continuing saga to try to prove 9/11 was more than terrists is really starting to get to me and I won't stand for it. You have not once tried to show the factual data, you only continue to spread rumors and propaganda. I will be posting the facts later in the day. Your actions are uncalled for.


think you had better go watch that 2 hour video first prof - you MAY just want to reconsider ..................... ;)


Which video are you referring to? The one I referred to you by Richard Gage of AE911Truth.org? Yeah, that is a must see. It covers and considers every hypothesis and the presenter is VERY impressive. He is the most credible of the 9/11 Truthers and is very articulate, rational, calm and has a pleasant likable personality that makes you feel comfortable listening to.

Re: 3 scientific journals publish thermite evidence in WTC dust!

23 Aug 2009, 13:54

ProfWag,
Yet more "factual data" for you, per your request. When will you take off your blinders?

Scientists, Scholars, Architects & Engineers respond to NIST
http://www.911blogger.com/node/17794

Re: 3 scientific journals publish thermite evidence in WTC dust!

23 Aug 2009, 13:58

Scepcop wrote:
brett wrote:
ProfWag wrote:Scepcop, you continuing saga to try to prove 9/11 was more than terrists is really starting to get to me and I won't stand for it. You have not once tried to show the factual data, you only continue to spread rumors and propaganda. I will be posting the facts later in the day. Your actions are uncalled for.


think you had better go watch that 2 hour video first prof - you MAY just want to reconsider ..................... ;)


Which video are you referring to? The one I referred to you by Richard Gage of AE911Truth.org? Yeah, that is a must see. It covers and considers every hypothesis and the presenter is VERY impressive. He is the most credible of the 9/11 Truthers and is very articulate, rational, calm and has a pleasant likable personality that makes you feel comfortable listening to.


yea sorry i was not clear on that - the one you mentioned above - ( mental note to self - must be clear about these things ) - apologies
Post a reply