View Active Topics          Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts          Switch to Mobile

WTC7 - WOPR is Online....

Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.

WTC7 - WOPR is Online....

Postby WOPR » 06 Aug 2015, 02:22

Image

WTC7 - ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION

A complete Empirically Verifiable Scientific Method Driven Graphical Target System
Analysis and Conclusion arrived at by Process of Elimination.


Image

The conditions required for gravitational acceleration
to occur have been known for centuries....

Image

The condition under which a body is, literally, free
to fall under the influence of the local gravitational field
with no resistance to its acceleration....

Image

The control that appears on the right in many of the
animations is intended as a reminder of that, and also
signals the beginning of a comparison....

Image

We can still know with certainty what conditions exist
beneath an object as it falls....

Image

....even though we may not be able to see into the
space beneath it as it does....

Image

Buckled columns, whether one or a hundred, whether one
at a time or all at once (or any combination thereof) won't just go
from 100% to 0% when they buckle, they'll steadily
decrease in strength while they buckle and that takes time....

Image

The mechanism of buckling, a mode of natural progressive
structural failure, whether caused by heat....

Image

....by overloading....

Image

....or even other modes of natural progressive structural failure
such as impact induced fracturing....

Image

....or fracturing due to overloading....

Image

....absolutely can not match or create the conditions required for gravitational
acceleration to occur, it's literally impossible. There is no such
thing as structural gravitational acceleration....

Image

Some force must be introduced to quickly remove all support from
beneath the literally falling visible upper part of the building seen
in the video. The claimed progressive collapse of the building
(NIST probable collapse sequence starting with column 79 on the left)....

Image

....that essentially happens all at once....

Image

....is clearly physically inconsistent with what we empirically
know
of natural progressive structural failure (defined as a time
consuming process of individual/sequential/simultaneous failure
involving one or a number of related structural components). It's
a physical impossibility for the lower part of the
asymmetrically damaged building (reportedly three core
columns and nine perimeter columns)....

Image

....to have naturally progressively collapsed in any way that
could result in the upper part of the building symmetrically
descending straight down through itself (NIST probable collapse
sequence starting with column 79 circled below) at anything
near gravitational acceleration for any period of time....

Image

Any scenario like that playing out below resulting from natural
progressive structural failure including a 105 foot 2.25 second period of
gravitational acceleration is an absolute physical impossibility....

Image

....and there is absolutely no mode or combination of modes of
natural progressive structural failure driven solely by gravity that
can ever give rise to the conditions required for free fall to have
occurred at any point during it's descent....

Image

The scenario playing out below is an absolute physical impossibility.
Just as there is no such thing as structural gravitational acceleration, nor is there any
failure mode known as natural progressive structural gravitational acceleration....

Image

There is simply no point during a natural progressive gravity driven
collapse of any steel frame skyscraper where one could say....
"Hold it.... right there! That's the point where all the steel columns
and structural components
that were supporting the building just a
moment ago
(with an area greater than that of a football field)
will undoubtedly be found to be behaving in a manner very much like
air
(below left). It will take very careful calculation to tell the fall
times apart during this free fall period of the ongoing natural
progressive structural failure
(below right)"....


Image

For the 2.25 seconds (eight stories, approximately 105 feet) that we
know the upper part of the building literally fell at gravitational
acceleration it cannot have been using any of it's potential
energy to crush the building contents, columns and other structural
components beneath it and undergo free fall at the same time (as
illustrated by this frangible impedance scenario)....

Image

It's physically impossible for the lower asymmetrically
damaged part of the building to have naturally progressively collapsed
in a way that could result in the upper part of the building actually
accelerating as it descended symmetrically straight down through
itself, through the path of maximum resistance (below right), and then,
driven on solely by gravity, actually continue to accelerate so
nearly to gravitational acceleration (below left) as to require very
careful calculation
for any difference between the two to be detected....

Image

Some other force powerful enough to quickly remove all support
from beneath the upper part of the building as it descended must
be introduced to explain the observed rate of descent during the 2.25
second period of gravitational acceleration. For the 2.25 seconds that the
building literally fell at gravitational acceleration, no other force
powerful enough to quickly remove all support from beneath the
upper part of the building was seen to be introduced from outside
the building, and no other force powerful enough to quickly remove
all support from beneath the upper part of the building is known
to have existed inside the building as an element or normal
function of it's infrastructure. For a load supported by a column to
descend at gravitational acceleration, all support must be quickly
removed, there's absolutely no other way. It must be knocked
out, pulled out, blown out, vaporized etc. Since no eight story tall
boulders were seen rumbling through Manhatten that day that could have
quickly knocked out all support....

Image

....and no suspicious looking Frenchmen were spotted rigging for verinage
(a form of controlled demolition) the night before that could have
quickly pulled out all support....

Image

....and no bombs or rockets were seen to be dropped on/fired at it that
could have quickly blown out all support....

Image

....and no giant laser beams or other secret weapons were being tested in
the area that could have quickly vaporized all support....

Image

....and no other force capable of quickly removing all support from
beneath the upper part of the building existed in the building as a
normal function of it's infrastructure (blue)....

Image

....it naturally follows that whatever the other force was that
must be introduced to explain the observed 2.25 seconds of descent
at gravitional acceleration, it must have been introduced some
time before the event, and unless someone can show how the
other force that must be introduced either during or just
before the collapse of the building was introduced from outside
the building, or that it was already existing inside the building as
a normal function of it's infrastructure, the process of elimination really
leaves only one possible explanation for the building's behaviour.
Some energetic material powerful enough to quickly remove all support
from beneath the upper part of the building during the 2.25 second period
of gravitational acceleration must have been physically transported
inside the building some time before the event, it had
to be brought in. The explosion model is the only one....

Image

....that can realistically match and empirically be expected to
create the conditions that we know must have existed....

Image

....beneath the literally falling visible upper part of the building
during its observed largely symmetrical descent at gravitational
acceleration for approximately 105 feet in 2.25 seconds....

Image

The undisputed (both the NIST and independent researchers alike agree)
observation of a significant well defined period of gravitational acceleration....

Image

Stage 1 (0 to 1.75 seconds): acceleration less than that of gravity (i.e., slower than free fall)

Stage 2 (1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)
NIST - "During Stage 2, the north face descended essentially (displaying all the absolutely
necessary, extremely important features) in free fall (free descent of a body in which the gravitational force is the only force acting on it), indicating negligible (so small or unimportant as to be not worth considering, insignificant) support from the structure below."


Stage 3 (4.0 to 5.4 seconds): decreased acceleration, again less than that of gravity

Image

....means that an explosion, or a number of explosions, must have
occurred that was powerful enough to quickly remove all support
from beneath the upper part of the building (below right), either all at
once or incrementally in advance of its descent, permitting it to descend
at gravitational acceleration for the observed period and under the
conditions required (below left) for free fall to occur....

Image

The empirically established fact that WTC7 was brought down by
explosives immediately shines a bright spotlight on literally the only
ones
who could possibly have carried out a covert domestic operation
of this magnitude (all the events of that day).... the only ones who
had exclusive 24/7 access to the highly secured building (WTC7).... the
only ones who were in complete control of the security system for
the building.... the only ones who had ready access to the quantity
and quality of energetic materials required.... and the only ones
who had the required expertise in the effective use of said energetic
materials. The fact is that only the Department of Defense/Central
Intelligence Agency could've done it. And just as one needn't be Isaac
Newton to see there is no other possible explanation for the behavior of
WTC7 other than energetic materials having been physically transported
inside the building, one needn't be Sherlock Holmes to see there is no
other possible explanation as to who could have done it since the building
was in perpetual lock down for many years as a highly secured
government facility, it's elementary....

Image.
User avatar
WOPR
 
Posts: 3
Joined: 06 Aug 2015, 00:49






Re: WTC7 - WOPR is Online....

Postby FatFreddy » 16 Aug 2015, 04:24

Great analysis. The disinfo agents are really going to look silly if they try to obfuscate that.


Here's some more info.

If any viewers don't have time to watch two hours of video, start watching this at the 4:27:49 time mark. There's a short summary of all the proof of controlled demolition of the Twin Towers.

September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M


If you have the time, start watching it at the 2:40:20 time mark.

If you have even more time, watch these videos.

ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 911 TRUTH (full unreleased version)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-V1CiuGMJo

Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 - AE911Truth.org
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMEHc14IWf4

Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth.org
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg

The Death of Controlled Demolition Expert Danny Jowenko after Speaking about 9/11 WTC 7 Building 7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zHHvo6U4lA


If you know anyone who looks at the above info and experiences cognitive dissonance and goes into denial, have him or her watch this video.

Why Can't They See The Truth? Psychologists Help 9 11 Truth Deniers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Xzmprkpxac


If the links go dead, do YouTube searches on the titles.
FatFreddy
 
Posts: 114
Joined: 12 Jan 2014, 03:31


Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests