Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.
8 posts • Page 1 of 1
What is your take on the current situation in France? I mean, since you don't think that Muslim Extremist flew planes into the WTCs, do you think that the murders in France is some big French government cover-up? Just curious...
Might have been. Looks suspiciously similar to the suspicious '2 brothers from Chechnya' Boston Marathon 'bombing'. There are a few fishy aspects to that one as well, to do with unusual activity from 'Craft' on the day, pictorial evidence, and the fact the kids were not radicalised at all, stayed at home back in Chechnya, etc -- looks to me as though they were paid a small sum by the CIA to be 'budding intelligence operatives' with a cover story, and they would have appreciated the extra money, and then of course they were turned into patsies.
You people are unfreakinbelievable. Total disrespect to the families and shamefully ignorant to the real world. If we all listened to what you had to say, the murderers of radical Islamist terrorism will continue to terrorize the world. It's time you wake up and realize that what's happening is a travesty and we need to do something to stop it right now and stop pretending that these events are not what they really are.
Who knows? I'm hearing ISIS is a fake, Al Qaeda is a fake. There are reasons they could be false flag organisations. The 'beheading' videos look faked, the supposed journalists and aid workers supposedly beheaded seem like military intelligence spooks to me, and we know they just 'got out' of military service to become journos and aid workers for some reason, and were oft captured. Lucky or unlucky to be captured and let go and recaptured so often? Even orgs like USAid and World Vision are half intelligence operations.
Anyhow, the ISIS/IS/Daesh thing came out of nowhere, it's a highly unlikely scenario. US intelligence thick on the ground everywhere had no idea they were massing and organising for 12 months? And yet these were supposed to be 'Syrian moderates' recruited by John McCain of all people? al Baghdadi snapped wearing a very expensive western wristwatch under his robes. Faked beheading videos. Their videos are too polished, complete with rotating logos. The beheading videos look like they're green screened. Everyone wearing masks, the PLO never used to do that, the last legitimate middle eastern protest organisation I'm aware of. 'ISIS' threatening and provoking superpowers like the US and UK and even Australia rather than keeping their heads down and forming a legitimate state and avoiding attacks -- it's as though they are just begging ppl in western countries to join their respective armies and attack them, they couldn't do a better recruitment job if they tried. Iraqi soldiers were solidly trained by US forces for some 8 years, then just dropped their weapons and ran. They are trained to destroy any materiel rather than have it fall into enemy hands, but they left it all behind. ISIS just happen to be conveniently trained on US weapons also. A tiny ISIS force has somehow routed a much larger and well trained Iraqi army force. Western powers have just been standing by and watching for some reason. The occasional supposed air sortie hits buildings unoccupied for 2 weeks every time. Surely ISIS' greatest enemy in the world would be Israel right next door, but they have said hardly a word against Israel, choosing to bait western superpowers instead to provoke incidents and interventions. All too convenient. Just happens to be the areas the West would like to control, and set Sunnis and Shias off against either with a newly partitioned Iraq and Syria. Just happens to conveniently threaten the Assad regime by other means. All fits into the US plan for middle eastern destabilisation and control.
The Murdoch disinfo machine is talking exactly like profwag about this, creating sensationalist headlines and multi page spreads, turning the deranged actions of a single nutter in Sydney into an organised ISIS attack etc. There's no question in my mind that Murdoch is fully in bed with the Republicans and those who gain to benefit from this, including now his own oil interests in Israel -- he very much got in on the ground floor there somehow...
There's never any aim to these disjointed 'terrorist' attacks, no message, no demands to free X or get out of country Y, nothing. The whole point of 'terrorising' another population is to get them to somehow stop what they are doing in your own sovereign country -- we are seeing no such messages or demands with this current crop of events, going right back to the very obviously faked events and inside job of 9/11.
Perhaps the below will help you Syd?
Yeah, terrific. The sock puppets speak. Charlie Hebdo went out of its way to publish insensitive racist anti-Islamic comics and insulting portrayals of Mohammed. Given the very large middle eastern population of Paris, that is a very 'courageous' thing to do, no matter how detrimental to everyone getting along in a tolerant multi cultural society. Those publications would probably be illegal in Australia under the (Federal) Racial Discrimination Act, S.18c, as per the article below.
And Pope Francis happens to agree with me -- as he pointed out recently, you don't attack people's strongly held beliefs that do no particular harm to anyone via so-called 'satire' under so-called 'freedom of speech' protections, it is just not civil. He pointed out if he insulted his colleague's mother, why wouldn't his colleague punch him in the nose as a matter of honour regardless of any legal consequences of doing so? And there's plenty of good ol' boys in the US who would of course do the same, the US is hardly a stranger to violence and death. Imagine if you will publishing one insulting caricature after another of Jesus Christ or indeed 'hillbillies who follow Jesus Christ' in a widely circulated publication in all the religious backwaters of the US, and wait to see who attacks the offices of the publishing house. It's enough that Christians in the US already kill doctors who perform abortions and bomb abortion clinics etc -- this is exactly the same principle -- acting out on lethal impulses to stop something you don't like based on a particular belief, religious or otherwise. The current US Tealiban angling towards a theocracy and intolerance of others' beliefs and religions is not much different.
So here we are with a strange race-baiting publication that seems almost contrived to draw the ire of the people it insults, and no other useful purpose. We are told they were all killed in an attack. But then I've been told 4 planes were hijacked with around 200 lives lost, and it's transparently obvious that didn't happen. Who knows what this setup was about.
Conservatives here are trying to stoke the flames by making a Charlie Hebdo incident or similar efforts at vilification more likely in this country -- potentially a useful geopolitical tool for fanning the flames of war and creating pretexts for invasion of other sovereign territories for resources, it seems. They want to set up the conditions for similar confrontations and abuses (whether false flags or real, as it can be hard to tell the difference) here also under the guise of 'liberating free speech', where 'free speech' can be any bigotry, calumny or defamation you like as long as it targets a helpless minority.
Here's a couple of articles from Crikey! wondering where the 'jesuisCharlie' movement came from, and why people are immediately embarassed for joining it so promptly. Then other 'conspiracy theory' writings wondered why the 'jesuisCharlie' placards in France were printed and available for circulation quite so promptly.
Charlie Hebdo attack was not an assault on free speech - www.crikey.com.au/2015/01/16/charlie-hebdo-attack-was-not-an-assault-on-free-speech/
Rundle: Charlie Hebdo, terrorism and the distortion of popular memory - http://www.crikey.com.au/2015/01/08/rundle-charlie-hebdo-terrorism-and-the-distortion-of-popular-memory/
Rundle: after Hebdo, the world enters political limbo - http://www.crikey.com.au/2015/01/14/rundle-after-hebdo-the-world-enters-political-limbo/
RAZER: JE NE SUIS PAS CHARLIE - http://dailyreview.crikey.com.au/razer-je-ne-suis-pas-charlie/17180
And of course we see Profwag, in his usual neocon kneejerk reaction (nothing to do with his avowed scepticism on other matters), choosing to use the opportunity to fan the flames of war in a region which just happens to have a lot of mineral and hydrocarbon resources, ripe for the taking, and heading off access by superpower competitors such as Russia, China and India which geographically surround it. Europe and the US want those resources ahead of anyone else, or at least the opportunity of being able to sell the resources to Chinese manufacturers and take a large cut rather than have China obtain them wholesale and direct from the supplier -- this is how the UK and the City of London have survived deindustrialisation on its own shores for 100 years now. This is also a direct repeat of some of the main causes of WWI, with Churchill trying to head off German access to middle eastern oil resources and other important industrial riches, in order to remain the #1 European superpower back in the day. Kind of ironic that the power bases have shifted so Europe is now a single bloc of former enemies and competitors trying to stiff other competitors like Russia, China and India in particular. In particular, it's quite possible France and the UK would join forces in staging false flag operations as a joint exercise -- I note little or nothing has happened in Germany yet which is financially fairly comfortable, potential GFC excesses and losses aside for the moment.
It's ironic that WWI pretty well started once Germany signed a claim to underground resources with the heavily indebted Ottoman Empire, and were in the process of building a Baghdad to Berlin railroad to start shipping stuff straight to German industry. The invasion of Afghanistan was predicated mostly on controlling oil pipelines, with the aim of setting up the TAPI pipeline from Turkmenistan to Europe, essentially, which the Taliban had rejected in meetings in 2000 with Unocal in Texas, facing a syndicate of Texas oilmen and neocon operatives from Washington. This prevents the flow of oil to near neighbours such as Russia, China and India.
History may not exactly repeat, but it certainly rhymes. Wait a sec, it's repeating.
That was probably part of it. The lithium deposits in Afghanistan were probably a major part of it too.
Of course there's also the oil in Iraq.
8 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests