JFK 50TH Anniversary

[SydneyPSIder]

hmm, random grab from the radio news, it appears 62% of people in a survey believe there was more than one shooter, even today.

[SydneyPSIder]

[Scepcop]

Have any of you been watching the CNN special programs on the 50th Anniversary of the JFK Assassination?

Why are they acting like it's an established fact that JFK was killed by a lone gunman when EVERYONE of average intelligence knows that that's total BS that was debunked long ago? That's pretty sick. And they are making themselves look like fools.

Some of the specials show clips from Jim Garrison and Mark Lane, but they are only interviewing those who support the Warren Commission's cover up and fiction, such as the lying sociopath Vince Bugliosi and Gerald Posner, who act with religious zeal that Oswald acted alone, which is odd because it is a 100 percent INDEFENSIBLE position that contradicts so much data. That's pretty sick.

How does Bugliosi and Posner explain:

- Why minutes after the assassination, J Edgar Hoover immediately said that Oswald was guilty and acted alone? How could he know that after a few minutes? That's a dead giveaway that he was a patsy set up in advance. What could be more obvious? No one can explain that away.
- Why the Dallas District Attorney said the SAME DAY of the assassination, that it was a "moral certainty" Oswald alone was guilty and no one else was involved. How could that be a moral certainty when there was no investigation and no way he could have known that? Unless of course, he was trying to frame him.
- Why 16 doctors and 40 medical personnel at the Parkland Hospital saw head wounds with a rear exit wound that contradicted the official autopsy photos, which can only mean that they were altered?
- Why there was a massive cover up attempt and suppression of evidence? If there was no conspiracy, then why classify documents and silence witnesses and sabotage Jim Garrison's prosecution case? That makes no sense. If there's nothing to hide, then why suppress?
- Why people with incriminating evidence, such as Dorothy Kilgallan who was the only person to interview Jack Ruby, suddenly decided to "commit suicide", or were made to look like they did?
- Why did most people at Dealey Plaza hear shots coming from the grassy knoll, including a police officer? Why were there fake Secret Service agents behind the fence at the grassy knoll?
- Why did Kennedy's head in the Zapruder film move to the BACK AND LEFT after the fatal head shot, if the shot came from the rear? No tests have ever shown that an object moves toward the shooter rather than away from it, as the lone nut theorists claimed and lied about, such as Gerald Posner (Case Closed) and Vince Bugliosi (Reclaiming History), who are attorneys, not truth seekers.
- Why was the arrest of Oswald never explained? The story goes that he entered a theater after the assassination without paying the ticket price. The theater staff called the police and all of a sudden, 20 cops showed up to arrest Oswald. Wouldn't the cops have been too busy looking for the assassin of JFK and the murderer of Officer Tippit to have bothered with a guy who entered a movie theater without paying? Yet they sent 20 men to get him? That's never been explained.
- Why did the Secret Service lower their protection around Kennedy's limo? They were all behind him or in front of him. Why was there no protection from the side? And why did the limo driver, William Greer, slow down to almost full stop when the shots began firing out, instead of speeding away? Why did he only speed away after Kennedy was killed by the fatal head shot? Actions speak louder than words don't they?
- Why did the Warren Commission move the bullet wound on Kennedy's back up 6 inches to try to match the "single bullet theory" needed for a lone assassin theory to work? Why alter the data if there's no conspiracy?
- Why did the guy running the morgue that housed Lee Harvey Oswald's body say that the FBI came and took ink prints of Oswald's hand, and then immediately after, they claimed that Oswald's fingerprints were on the alleged rifle? If he alone was guilty, then why would they have to take fingerprints from his body and plant them on the rifle? That makes no sense.
- If the fatal head shot came from behind, then why did Jackie Kennedy climb onto the back of the limo to try to retrieve a piece of her husband's head that was blown off? Shouldn't she have climbed to the front of the limo? CNN's piece NEVER addressed this. They obviously aren't objective truth seekers.

Most of these facts are impossible to explain away to defend the lone nut theory. Bugliosi would have to be a lying sociopath with no conscience to try to defend the lone nut theory which is 100 percent indefensible.

Why does CNN lack any critical thinking on this matter and fail to ask any of these critical questions? Yet CNN is critical on other subjects such as petty low level civilian crimes. Go figure.

See my post "Motives for Killing JFK: Powerful Interests vs. Lee Harvey Oswald":
viewtopic.php?f=12&t=2631

CNN's articles about the JFK Assassination:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/22/us/kenned ... ?hpt=hp_t1

[Scepcop]

Check out this clip on CNN's Piers Morgan where Oliver Stone, director of JFK, gives three simple irrefutable facts that prove that JFK was assassinated by a conspiracy.

[ProfWag]

[ProfWag]

[SydneyPSIder]

It was LBJ and GHWB wot done it. Strange connections between the Bushes and John Hinckley Jr who attempted to assassinate Ronald Reagan also.

[ProfWag]

[Scepcop]

Here is a funny satire video called "JFK: A Conspiracy Theory".



Here is a great presentation about who killed JFK and how they did it, by Professor Jerry Kroth, that puts together all the pieces of the puzzle.

[SydneyPSIder]

[SydneyPSIder]

[Scepcop]

[Scepcop]

[Scepcop]

There's something I don't understand.

Why does CNN and the US government believe with 100 percent certainty that Oswald acted alone? I mean, even if Oswald was guilty, there is no way in hell you can prove that he acted alone and that there were not multiple shooters involved. So why are they so certain about it? Very odd.

A friend of mine told me that the reason he doesn't believe in conspiracies, is that one or two people can conspire to commit a crime together. But any more than that, and they start talking or refuse to participate out of conscience. He believes that this point alone debunks all "conspiracy theories".

What do you all think of his reasoning?

[Scepcop]

Profwag,
Question for you. If the fatal head shot came from the back, then why did Jacqueline Kennedy move to the back of the limo to retrieve JFK's head fragment that was blown off? Shouldn't the fragment have been propelled forward?

How do you know that Oswald acted alone and that there were no multiple shooters?