In a Perfect World

[Arouet]

[SydneyPSIder]

Last edited by SydneyPSIder on 22 Dec 2012, 05:35, edited 1 time in total.

[Arouet]

C'mon Sydney- you're really misrepresenting the situation now. Not very honest of you. I described very clearly that I was willing to go over the videos in a structured way after we finished with the radiation issue.

[SydneyPSIder]

Last edited by SydneyPSIder on 22 Dec 2012, 05:49, edited 1 time in total.

[Arouet]

We're finished with the radiation issue??? We barely got started on it! You challenged me to engage in a discussion on that topic and the moment I did you began backpeddling. You seem completely unwilling to engage in any discussion that doesn't involve you ranting or dropping videos.

I've suggested that if we're going to discuss these issues and actually get somewhere, what we first need to do is define the questions that need answering, and then go and try and actually answer them.

Frankly, the fact that you label the methodology I suggested as an effort to stall makes me question the methodology that you use in researching and discussing these issues. But maybe I'm missing something: can you describe specifically what problem you have with what I set out so far?

[Arouet]

There's no multiquoting on this forum (or is there and I just can't find it?) Ninja: are you able to move the radition posts to a new thread easily?

[NinjaPuppy]

[NinjaPuppy]

Moving a wayward discussion of optimum posting techniques here from the Moon Hoax Topic.

[NinjaPuppy]

Testing, One, Two, Three, Testing.

Wow! It worked the first time...for a change. Now when Arouet decides what he wants the actual radiation topic to be about, I will change the topic title accordingly and add whatever terms and conditions text to explain what he wants to put forth and how he expects everyone to conform. Meanwhile, DEAL WITH IT!