View Active Topics          Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts          Switch to Mobile

Radical New Theories on 9/11

Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.

Radical New Theories on 9/11

Postby Scepcop » 19 Nov 2012, 04:54

Check out these radical new theories on 9/11. They are well argued and worth considering.

Dr. Judy Wood's directed energy beam explanation, which she claims is the only one that fits the data.

http://www.drjudywood.com

Her book website:

http://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com

Her book on Amazon.com has 92 raving reviews that claim that her explanation adds up. Check them out here:

http://www.amazon.com/Towers-Evidence-D ... pd_vtp_b_1

Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11

Book Description
Publication Date: 2010 | ISBN-10: 0615412564 | ISBN-13: 978-0615412566

This book is a forensic analysis of what effectively is a crime scene. Ground Zero and the surrounding areas were photographed countless thousands of times, yet no one really assessed all of the phenomena found in these photographs. What is presented in this book is not a theory and it is not speculation. It is evidence. It is the body of empirical evidence that must be explained in order to determine what happened at Ground Zero.

Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda. The popular chant, "9/11 was an inside job," is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that "19 bad guys with box cutters did it." Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court. Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.

The order of crime solving is to determine

1) WHAT happened, then

2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then

3) WHO did it. And only then can we address

4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).

Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime. You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief. You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don't even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you'd better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. Yet, before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.

Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory. My research is not speculation. It is a forensic investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11.

----------------------------------------------

Here are two other books with radical new theories about 9/11, one involving no planes and faked hijackings, and the other involving occult rituals and black magic with black ops technology.

http://www.amazon.com/Planes-without-Pa ... pd_vtp_b_3

Planes without Passengers: The Faked Hijackings of 9/11 (2nd Edition)

Book Description
Publication Date: August 10, 2012

Only two planes of the four planes alleged to be connected with the 9/11 plot actually flew on that day. And the passengers were not people who paid a ticket to go from one place to another.

The theory outlined above that you will read in this edition is based primarily upon two facts: (1) the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), which maintains information on all commercial flights in the United States, in its original form stated clearly that while United 175 and United 93 were scheduled and flew, American 11 and American 77 did not and (2) ACARS, a system much like electronic mail and GPS, shows that United 175 and United 93 were flying over the Midwestern part of the United States long after their supposed "crashes" on the east coast.

These facts should open a floodgate of questions about the events of this day. Who were the "passengers" who boarded a flight later falsely asserted to have crashed? Where did they go? What about those claiming to be relatives of dead "passengers"?

The author provides the best answer based on facts. Are you ready to hear it?

http://www.amazon.com/The-Most-Dangerou ... pd_vtp_b_5

The Most Dangerous Book in the World: 9/11 as Mass Ritual

Book Description
Publication Date: September 11, 2012

In this shocking exposé, investigative researcher and author S. K. Bain explores the inconsistencies, coincidences, and historical precedents of the events of September 11, 2001, and reconstructs an occult-driven script for a Global Luciferian MegaRitual. Bain argues forcefully that the framework for the entire event was a psychological warfare campaign built upon a deadly foundation of black magick and high technology. The book details a view of the sinister nature of the defining event of the 21st century and opens a window into the vast scope of the machinery of oppression that the author asserts has been constructed around us.
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29






Re: Radical New Theories on 9/11

Postby SydneyPSIder » 19 Nov 2012, 22:00

Judy Wood strikes me as a crank. She's either delusional or set up to discredit valid investigations. There is no evidence such weapons exist, or could be deployed in NYC that day, and nothing happened that cannot be achieved by conventional demolition techniques and a lot of fake films.
SydneyPSIder
 
Posts: 1124
Joined: 10 Sep 2012, 18:24

Re: Radical New Theories on 9/11

Postby Misha » 19 Nov 2012, 22:55

Scepcop wrote:Check out these radical new theories on 9/11. They are well argued and worth considering.

Dr. Judy Wood's directed energy beam explanation, which she claims is the only one that fits the data.

http://www.drjudywood.com

Her book website:

http://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com

Her book on Amazon.com has 92 raving reviews that claim that her explanation adds up. Check them out here:

http://www.amazon.com/Towers-Evidence-D ... pd_vtp_b_1

Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11

Book Description
Publication Date: 2010 | ISBN-10: 0615412564 | ISBN-13: 978-0615412566

This book is a forensic analysis of what effectively is a crime scene. Ground Zero and the surrounding areas were photographed countless thousands of times, yet no one really assessed all of the phenomena found in these photographs. What is presented in this book is not a theory and it is not speculation. It is evidence. It is the body of empirical evidence that must be explained in order to determine what happened at Ground Zero.

Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda. The popular chant, "9/11 was an inside job," is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that "19 bad guys with box cutters did it." Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court. Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.

The order of crime solving is to determine

1) WHAT happened, then

2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then

3) WHO did it. And only then can we address

4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).

Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime. You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief. You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don't even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you'd better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. Yet, before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.

Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory. My research is not speculation. It is a forensic investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11.

----------------------------------------------

Here are two other books with radical new theories about 9/11, one involving no planes and faked hijackings, and the other involving occult rituals and black magic with black ops technology.

http://www.amazon.com/Planes-without-Pa ... pd_vtp_b_3

Planes without Passengers: The Faked Hijackings of 9/11 (2nd Edition)

Book Description
Publication Date: August 10, 2012

Only two planes of the four planes alleged to be connected with the 9/11 plot actually flew on that day. And the passengers were not people who paid a ticket to go from one place to another.

The theory outlined above that you will read in this edition is based primarily upon two facts: (1) the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), which maintains information on all commercial flights in the United States, in its original form stated clearly that while United 175 and United 93 were scheduled and flew, American 11 and American 77 did not and (2) ACARS, a system much like electronic mail and GPS, shows that United 175 and United 93 were flying over the Midwestern part of the United States long after their supposed "crashes" on the east coast.

These facts should open a floodgate of questions about the events of this day. Who were the "passengers" who boarded a flight later falsely asserted to have crashed? Where did they go? What about those claiming to be relatives of dead "passengers"?

The author provides the best answer based on facts. Are you ready to hear it?

http://www.amazon.com/The-Most-Dangerou ... pd_vtp_b_5

The Most Dangerous Book in the World: 9/11 as Mass Ritual

Book Description
Publication Date: September 11, 2012

In this shocking exposé, investigative researcher and author S. K. Bain explores the inconsistencies, coincidences, and historical precedents of the events of September 11, 2001, and reconstructs an occult-driven script for a Global Luciferian MegaRitual. Bain argues forcefully that the framework for the entire event was a psychological warfare campaign built upon a deadly foundation of black magick and high technology. The book details a view of the sinister nature of the defining event of the 21st century and opens a window into the vast scope of the machinery of oppression that the author asserts has been constructed around us.


I just got reading this book (The Most Dangerous Book in the World), Scepcop. Nick Bryant author of the "Franklin Scandal" recommended it to me. In fact, I ordered and received Michael Hoffman's book which Bain references throughout his work. I am very familiar with most of Bain's occult references.

Upon reflection of the destruction of the WTC towers I came to understand, based on my research, that what we and the world were experiencing was a strategic program by these occultists. I have often said to my friends right after the 9/11 attacks that there was a design which few understood. Furthermore, I had pointed out that when David and Nelson Rockefeller first stuck the spade into the WTC site in their groundbreaking ceremony that this was not the first act of building, but one of destruction. I told Nick Bryant this too. I swear I made this observation right after 9/11. And now, I read this from Bain:

From the book - "The Most Dangerous Book in the World," pages 104 & 105:

"Yet, the Twin Towers were not merely imbued from their beginning with evil energies, or transformed through their astrological and magickal means into symbolic, the literal, Gates of Hell. The very buildings themselves were constructed of symbols, symbols of steel that stated plainly and on a monumental scale to whom these towers were dedicated, and, in hindsight, foreshadowed the ultimate use to which they would be put on 9/11.


"As you attempt to process the implications of this revelation, consider this: combined with the other evidence, it now becomes extremely difficult to escape the conclusion that these buildings were designed and constructed with their ultimate purpose in mind. It seems that these structures were preordained to become twin towering infernos, the gates of Hell, Hell on earth--filled with tormented victims, innocents, heroes, whole sacrifices, human sacrifices, sacrificed by fire. They were, unmistakably, Satanic MegaAlters."
Misha
 
Posts: 438
Joined: 19 Aug 2012, 03:42

Re: Radical New Theories on 9/11

Postby SydneyPSIder » 20 Nov 2012, 02:45

I don't know about occult altars, most things in the world can be explained by the seeking of money and power. (Or national and ethnic survival in one case.) Try reading Demonic Males instead...

http://www.amazon.com/Demonic-Males-Ori ... onic+males
SydneyPSIder
 
Posts: 1124
Joined: 10 Sep 2012, 18:24

Re: Radical New Theories on 9/11

Postby Misha » 20 Nov 2012, 05:47

SydneyPSIder wrote:I don't know about occult altars, most things in the world can be explained by the seeking of money and power. (Or national and ethnic survival in one case.) Try reading Demonic Males instead...

http://www.amazon.com/Demonic-Males-Ori ... onic+males


That looks like an interesting read, SydneyPSIder. Let us know what you think after reading the book. Currently I am reading "Through Our Enemies' Eyes" by Michael Scheuer. Scheuer was an intelligence analyst with the Bin Laden Unit for many years. It's a very instructive read on Islam versus the ideology of the west. Scheuer, however, will not go as far to say that 9/11 was an inside job. He chastises the west for its simplistic views on Islam and the west's inability to understand the dynamics between two ideologies. Furthermore, Scheuer illustrates how the government, military, intelligence and the media propagated these lies on the American people regarding Islam. Maybe Scheuer should take his own advice and look inward with what really happened on 9/11. Hypocrisy appears to be on many levels. Still, an excellent book.
Misha
 
Posts: 438
Joined: 19 Aug 2012, 03:42

Re: Radical New Theories on 9/11

Postby SydneyPSIder » 20 Nov 2012, 08:45

Misha wrote:
SydneyPSIder wrote:I don't know about occult altars, most things in the world can be explained by the seeking of money and power. (Or national and ethnic survival in one case.) Try reading Demonic Males instead...

http://www.amazon.com/Demonic-Males-Ori ... onic+males


That looks like an interesting read, SydneyPSIder. Let us know what you think after reading the book. Currently I am reading "Through Our Enemies' Eyes" by Michael Scheuer. Scheuer was an intelligence analyst with the Bin Laden Unit for many years. It's a very instructive read on Islam versus the ideology of the west. Scheuer, however, will not go as far to say that 9/11 was an inside job. He chastises the west for its simplistic views on Islam and the west's inability to understand the dynamics between two ideologies. Furthermore, Scheuer illustrates how the government, military, intelligence and the media propagated these lies on the American people regarding Islam. Maybe Scheuer should take his own advice and look inward with what really happened on 9/11. Hypocrisy appears to be on many levels. Still, an excellent book.

I read Demonic Males many years ago, it was quite interesting -- middle brow representation of various field observations and research. Still got the copy here somewhere, I'll send you the yellowing acid paper tome!

Re the other stuff, there is the 'Clash of Fundamentalisms' work as a response to 'Clash of Civilisations'...

http://www.amazon.com/Clash-Fundamental ... 185984457X
SydneyPSIder
 
Posts: 1124
Joined: 10 Sep 2012, 18:24

Re: Radical New Theories on 9/11

Postby Scepcop » 15 Dec 2012, 04:10

SydneyPSIder wrote:Judy Wood strikes me as a crank. She's either delusional or set up to discredit valid investigations. There is no evidence such weapons exist, or could be deployed in NYC that day, and nothing happened that cannot be achieved by conventional demolition techniques and a lot of fake films.


How do you know? Have you read her book or looked at her evidence? Jesse Ventura looked at it and has concluded that her explanation is the only one that fits the data, so he's changed his mind about thermite and explosives in the WTC.

Check out this important episode of Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura about direct energy weapons where he talks to Dr. Judy Wood. It starts with Nikola Tesla's discovery of energy weapons, then goes into Reagan's Star Wars program, and then Jesse and his son talk to Dr. Judy Wood about how directed energy beams brought down the WTC on 9/11. They also get a demonstration of energy weapons by John Hutchinson, who developed them based on Tesla's designs, and coined the term "The Hutchinson Effect". This episode is pretty disturbing and informative.

Shockingly, an insider that Jesse interviewed suddenly died 2 days after the interview. That's pretty disturbing, and means that this show has already gotten someone killed for exposing too much on TV. I wonder if that will prevent other whistleblowers from appearing on the show.

Here is the link to it:

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29


Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron