View Active Topics          Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts          Switch to Mobile

Inconsistensies

Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.

Re: Inconsistensies

Postby NinjaPuppy » 08 Oct 2012, 08:43

SydneyPSIder wrote:I don't know if anyone is particularly interested in the parameters of this topic.

Then feel free to ignore the topic if it is of no interest to you.
User avatar
NinjaPuppy
 
Posts: 4002
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 20:44






Re: Inconsistensies

Postby Arouet » 08 Oct 2012, 08:56

NinjaPuppy wrote:
SydneyPSIder wrote:I don't know if anyone is particularly interested in the parameters of this topic.

Then feel free to ignore the topic if it is of no interest to you.


This. I never understand why people post in a thread just to say they are not interested in the thread.

I have no idea how you would see my thread (the first I've started in awhile) as flooding.
User avatar
Arouet
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 03:07

Re: Inconsistensies

Postby really? » 08 Oct 2012, 11:56

As I see it, the motive behind posting on a thread that supposedly holds no interest but actually touches a nerve, is to trivialize the topic and too shut down other readers from commenting positively with the topic. I think SydneyPSIder may feel that he is on trial and that looking in depth at the topic he might have to look critically at his own position.
really?
 
Posts: 1009
Joined: 06 Mar 2010, 20:58

Re: Inconsistensies

Postby SydneyPSIder » 08 Oct 2012, 15:01

really? wrote:As I see it, the motive behind posting on a thread that supposedly holds no interest but actually touches a nerve, is to trivialize the topic and too shut down other readers from commenting positively with the topic. I think SydneyPSIder may feel that he is on trial and that looking in depth at the topic he might have to look critically at his own position.

Not at all. I hope you enjoy continuing to post and engage with this topic! No more interest from me though...
SydneyPSIder
 
Posts: 1124
Joined: 10 Sep 2012, 18:24

Re: Inconsistensies

Postby Arouet » 08 Oct 2012, 16:26

I'm not sure there's much more to say on this topic. I don't think anyone really disagreed with me. It's not that complicated a point, but one that I think is sometimes forgotten.
User avatar
Arouet
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 03:07

Re: Inconsistensies

Postby Misha » 11 Oct 2012, 04:36

I guess "inconsistencies" inflict the establishment too. Check out this NY Times article.

And we get called "conspiracy theorists!" It would be nice to have a Joe Wilson on our side. Or, maybe a Jack Welch! (LOL).

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/10/opini ... h_20121010

Clay

P.S. I got it. How about calling the lucid "conspiracy theorists" - Program recognition specialists! Will it fly?
Misha
 
Posts: 438
Joined: 19 Aug 2012, 03:42

Previous

Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests

cron