Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.
Just on the OP, I note there has been a follow-up study on nanothermite/thermate/thermite etc which finds that the dust samples are a paint layer. I've had a quick glance over the study, and a quick glance over the original nanothermite dust investigation study in the past. It would be necessary to re-evaluate both of them closely. e.g. in the original study, applying heat to the paint chips resulted in a major visible exothermic reaction, caught on video (which is presumably legit). This would not happen with paint, as every building would then be much like the Hindenberg waiting to go off. This is a major weakness of the 'debunking' study which conveniently makes no reference to the exothermic potential of the chips.
However, the 'spray-on nanothermite' argument has never been one to me that was required to explain the extraordinary collapse of steel framed skyscrapers in a low temperature fire -- other demolition methods could easily have been used. Conventional thermite-based cutting devices may have been the first step, followed by timed C-4 plastic charges to blow out the joints and demolish the building. I don't actually see where a nanothermite spray coating is even required for such a demolition, although if such a thing was found, it would imply '19 Saudi Arabian terrorists' could not have gained the necessary access to apply such a coating and adds more incredulity to the official account.
There are way too many other points that stretch credulity in the official account to make all the problems go away, however -- patsy 'airline pilots' unable to even fly a single-engined Cessna, claims in the official story that don't fit the data, and so on. Same applies to Madrid, 7/7 and 21/7. All false flag operations and frame-ups on the evidence.
I see some of you in this and it's not the good parts.
tag-team trolling now. surely you pseudosceptics got all this stuff out of your system when this forum first got up?
the bad parts are all yours, jimmy, you just don't like people calling your game...
Oh hell no!
First off, I don't see it as "trolling" at all. I believe that we have a great bunch of core members here who express their views extremely well on all topics. I do feel that 'in the beginning' the skeptics chased off many, if not all of the opposition but I believe that if you can't stand the heat, stay out of the Spamalamadingdong. It's not like this place has a nasty vibe or attitude. It has an extremely logical and educational exchange of wit and wisdom. I've learned a lot about things that I would otherwise not understand. Heck, I've learned volumes about topics that I had zero interest in.
That goes for me too and includes the below topic that I learned volumes but had zero interest in: (Can you say, TMI?)
Well at least I have character and professional references. See them here:
And plus, I have no history of ever having lied or deceived anyone.
That makes me credible by objective standards.
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests