SCEPCOP Forum

This link http://forums.randi.org/local_links.php?catid=18 will lead to a page of links addressing the facts and myths of 9/11.

Why would be believe someone like Randi as a credible source on anything? This is a guy who likes to get deluded people on stage and mock them.

yeah, sorry, it's just his forum site full of his fanboi pseudosceptics. Did you win the pedantry prize at school?

So if someone linked to a thread that you made on this forum, an appropriate response would be: "Why would we believe someone like WInston Wu is a credible source on anything?"

Winston is a conundrum wrapped in an enigma...

Sure, but I think you see my point?

I think Winston is on the ball on a lot of things, and I broadly endorse his views -- and I think he's done an amazing thing putting a forum together to challenge pseudosceptics the world over. So it's birds of a feather, just as pseudosceptics like to post on Randi's website...

Yeah, I've dissected some of Scepcop's musings on that before. But I'm not asking Scepcop - he thinks using primarily testimonials is a reliable was to figure out if medication is effection- I'm asking you. How would you define what is a skeptical approach to a problem?

Maybe I'll start a thread on this.