SCEPCOP Forum

Check this out. Dimitri Khalezov, a former Russian intelligence officer and nuclear detonation expert, claims to have solved the mysteries surrounding 9/11. He has written a book called "The Third Truth" where he explains with plenty of documents and science that the WTC was destroyed and pulverized by nuclear detonation devices planted underground, which were placed many years ago. These are not nuclear bombs, but nuclear detonation devices designed for building demolition. They are relatively unknown to the public, but real, Dimitri says. This is the only explanation that fits the data, as the other explanations - fire, thermite, and bombs - do NOT account for the 80,000 tons of steel of the WTC pulverizing into fine dust and collapsing at near free fall speed, which neither fire, thermite, nor explosives alone can account for.

Here is his four hour interview below, where he explains it all in convincing detail. It's very interesting. He seems like a really smart guy and sounds like he knows what he's talking about. He even claims to personally know those who plotted 9/11. His theory fits a lot of the data that other theories don't, so it seems worth considering.





Description:

(Part 1 of 2 Full) Amazing interview with Dimitri Khalezov, former Nuclear Intelligence officer of the Soviet Union. Because of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty of 1976 between the USA and the former USSR and Dimitri's military role in the USSR's Nuclear Intelligence division, Dimitri had certain knowledge of the WTC demolition schema, which was required to obtain the original WTC building permit in New York (i.e. NY did not issue a building permit without submitting a demolition schema). Dimitri uses his insider information combined with his military background to explain the events of 911 in depth. He leaves no 911 question unanswered.

In Part 1, Dimitri explains:
- Dimitri Khalezov background
- Planes and explosions
- Pentagon mentioned (explained fully in Part 2)
- Nuclear detonations explained
- WTC1 & WTC2 nuclear demolition

In this Part 2, Dimitri explains:
- WTC 7
- Ground Zero definition
- Pentagon missile attack in detail
- Seismic readings
- 911 media manipulation
- F93 crash in Shanksville, PA
- Cell phone calls
- Hijackers
- 911 rescue workers and illness
- Ground Zero cleanup

Dimitri's websites:
http://www.911thology.com
http://www.911thology.cn

Let's meet at ground zero with a handful of giger counters and check for radiation. . . we'll go into the museum and check the artifacts as well.

Give me a blank'n break!

Nuclear Explosions?

That's just gone beyond stupidity Winston... far beyond stupidity.

Breathtaking ain't it!

Here in part 14 of the interview, Dimitri explains why WTC1 and 2 were demolished in the order that they were, even though the first one to fall was hit second. He also explains why Building 7 was demolished, even though it looked suspicious, in order to cover up something. So they felt that it was the lesser of two evils. The whole plot is more complicated than you think, apparently.

Scepcop, if you watch 4 hours of that guy, you wasted 3 hours and 59 minutes of your life. I do feel sorry for people who believe things people say just because they "sound like they know what they are talking about" rather than look at facts, the opinions of actual experts, and plain ol' common sense.

A "Truth Seeker" buys into any and all long-haired suppositions; especially when they trace back to Free Masonry (a.k.a. the Illuminati) and in turn, ET and all his chums who in truth, used a mind ray to make those fanatical Muslims crash two huge airliners into the WTC and a 3rd into the Pentagon plus a 4th non-existent plane into a farm field.

I can't believe I've been so blind and my mind so corrupted by all the FACTS out there

Skeptics, Shills and Paid Debunkers,

I'd like you to explain this one. A few seconds before the collapse of one of the towers, you can clearly see the ground shake in this video:



From another angle, you can see the same earthquake happen just before collapse:



Now how do you denialists and paid debunkers explain that one? How can you obfuscate or confuse this one? It's obvious proof, no matter how you try to obfuscate it.

Dimitri Khalezov did a four hour TV interview in Europe about the nuclear demolition of the WTC. You can see it here.

I have no clue as to what you've being so dramatic about, camera motion can be caused by numerous things, including wind (which there would be, given the large blaze and how it would create a draw through the streets) but there was no Earthquake -- NADA! You guys are grasping at straws when it comes to this claim or if you are suggesting that its due to explosions underground, etc.

Why can't you accept ANYTHING that's offered in way of an official conclusion? Why must everything be part of a conspiracy of some kind?

It would be impossible logistically, let alone all the physical requisites that would have to be kept secret, to pull off the sort of thing you and your fellow mental patients keep insisting "happened". Stop listening to people that echo your assumptions and start looking at the LEGITIMATE sciences behind what was going on. Look at the fact that Osoma was a student of structural engineering and probably had a decent understanding as to what the fire, extra weight of the planes themselves and the additional sway created around the crashes and how it would affect the outcome.

Use some actual mainstream logic and stop it with the hypothetical and outlandish. 9/11 happened as the result of a well planned attack NOTHING MORE! We really did land on the moon and private industry as well as other nations are in the pre-production phase of populating it and quite likely a nearby asteroid within the next 6-10 years, Richard Branson seemingly leading the way.

Look at the very easy to get your hands on public facts and stop believing in the Nursery Rhymes and Grimm Tales.


Oh! I challenge you and your fellow freakazoids to walk over ground zero with radiation detectors and get readings that would prove nuclear discharge. Get the tangible & provable data such as an increase in radiation sickness throughout the NYC areas, cancer in young people (that is related to radiation exposure not the particles of dust many are still having problems with). Sorry, but me thinks thine ass has been talking to you a bit much.