View Active Topics          Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts          Switch to Mobile

Nuclear demolition of WTC on 9/11 - Dimitri Khalezov

Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.

Nuclear demolition of WTC on 9/11 - Dimitri Khalezov

Postby Scepcop » 16 Sep 2011, 03:07

Check this out. Dimitri Khalezov, a former Russian intelligence officer and nuclear detonation expert, claims to have solved the mysteries surrounding 9/11. He has written a book called "The Third Truth" where he explains with plenty of documents and science that the WTC was destroyed and pulverized by nuclear detonation devices planted underground, which were placed many years ago. These are not nuclear bombs, but nuclear detonation devices designed for building demolition. They are relatively unknown to the public, but real, Dimitri says. This is the only explanation that fits the data, as the other explanations - fire, thermite, and bombs - do NOT account for the 80,000 tons of steel of the WTC pulverizing into fine dust and collapsing at near free fall speed, which neither fire, thermite, nor explosives alone can account for.

Here is his four hour interview below, where he explains it all in convincing detail. It's very interesting. He seems like a really smart guy and sounds like he knows what he's talking about. He even claims to personally know those who plotted 9/11. His theory fits a lot of the data that other theories don't, so it seems worth considering.





Description:

(Part 1 of 2 Full) Amazing interview with Dimitri Khalezov, former Nuclear Intelligence officer of the Soviet Union. Because of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty of 1976 between the USA and the former USSR and Dimitri's military role in the USSR's Nuclear Intelligence division, Dimitri had certain knowledge of the WTC demolition schema, which was required to obtain the original WTC building permit in New York (i.e. NY did not issue a building permit without submitting a demolition schema). Dimitri uses his insider information combined with his military background to explain the events of 911 in depth. He leaves no 911 question unanswered.

In Part 1, Dimitri explains:
- Dimitri Khalezov background
- Planes and explosions
- Pentagon mentioned (explained fully in Part 2)
- Nuclear detonations explained
- WTC1 & WTC2 nuclear demolition

In this Part 2, Dimitri explains:
- WTC 7
- Ground Zero definition
- Pentagon missile attack in detail
- Seismic readings
- 911 media manipulation
- F93 crash in Shanksville, PA
- Cell phone calls
- Hijackers
- 911 rescue workers and illness
- Ground Zero cleanup

Dimitri's websites:
http://www.911thology.com
http://www.911thology.cn
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29






Re: Russian nuclear expert claims to have solved 9/11 myster

Postby Craig Browning » 17 Sep 2011, 00:36

HOW STUPID. . . HOW GULLIBLE ARE YOU?

Let's meet at ground zero with a handful of giger counters and check for radiation. . . we'll go into the museum and check the artifacts as well.

Give me a blank'n break!

Nuclear Explosions? :shock:

That's just gone beyond stupidity Winston... far beyond stupidity.
User avatar
Craig Browning
 
Posts: 1526
Joined: 13 Feb 2010, 05:20
Location: Northampton, MA

Re: Russian nuclear expert claims to have solved 9/11 myster

Postby Arouet » 17 Sep 2011, 07:09

Breathtaking ain't it!
User avatar
Arouet
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 03:07

Re: Russian nuclear expert claims to have solved 9/11 myster

Postby Scepcop » 17 Sep 2011, 22:50

Craig Browning wrote:HOW STUPID. . . HOW GULLIBLE ARE YOU?

Let's meet at ground zero with a handful of giger counters and check for radiation. . . we'll go into the museum and check the artifacts as well.

Give me a blank'n break!

Nuclear Explosions? :shock:

That's just gone beyond stupidity Winston... far beyond stupidity.


If you listen to his four hour interview linked above, he explains all that. The interviewer asks him the same questions you did above. But you guys are pompous and arrogant and never listen. A truth seeker keeps his mind open to possibilities.

FYI, these are not nuclear bombs, but nuclear detonation devices, which are different. Listen to him explain it in detail. He sounds like he knows what he is talking about. Russians are very smart people too. They are the world's best chess players, and think ahead of everybody.
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Russian nuclear expert claims to have solved 9/11 myster

Postby Scepcop » 17 Sep 2011, 22:53

Here in part 14 of the interview, Dimitri explains why WTC1 and 2 were demolished in the order that they were, even though the first one to fall was hit second. He also explains why Building 7 was demolished, even though it looked suspicious, in order to cover up something. So they felt that it was the lesser of two evils. The whole plot is more complicated than you think, apparently.

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Russian nuclear expert solves 9/11 mysteries?

Postby ProfWag » 18 Sep 2011, 00:36

Scepcop, if you watch 4 hours of that guy, you wasted 3 hours and 59 minutes of your life. I do feel sorry for people who believe things people say just because they "sound like they know what they are talking about" rather than look at facts, the opinions of actual experts, and plain ol' common sense.
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: Russian nuclear expert solves 9/11 mysteries?

Postby Scepcop » 18 Sep 2011, 01:49

ProfWag wrote:Scepcop, if you watch 4 hours of that guy, you wasted 3 hours and 59 minutes of your life. I do feel sorry for people who believe things people say just because they "sound like they know what they are talking about" rather than look at facts, the opinions of actual experts, and plain ol' common sense.


You are not a truth seeker. A truth seeker does not dismiss things out of hand, especially about things that you are not an expert in. Dimitri is an expert in nuclear power and physics. You aren't. If you were a truth seeker, you'd listen to what he has to say first, for at least an hour. What if he's right? Did you ever ask yourself that? Why are you so closed minded that you only accept one reality of everything?
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Russian nuclear expert solves 9/11 mysteries?

Postby Craig Browning » 18 Sep 2011, 21:13

A "Truth Seeker" buys into any and all long-haired suppositions; especially when they trace back to Free Masonry (a.k.a. the Illuminati) and in turn, ET and all his chums who in truth, used a mind ray to make those fanatical Muslims crash two huge airliners into the WTC and a 3rd into the Pentagon plus a 4th non-existent plane into a farm field.

I can't believe I've been so blind and my mind so corrupted by all the FACTS out there :oops:
User avatar
Craig Browning
 
Posts: 1526
Joined: 13 Feb 2010, 05:20
Location: Northampton, MA

Re: Russian nuclear expert solves 9/11 mysteries?

Postby ProfWag » 19 Sep 2011, 05:18

Scepcop wrote:
ProfWag wrote:Scepcop, if you watch 4 hours of that guy, you wasted 3 hours and 59 minutes of your life. I do feel sorry for people who believe things people say just because they "sound like they know what they are talking about" rather than look at facts, the opinions of actual experts, and plain ol' common sense.


You are not a truth seeker. A truth seeker does not dismiss things out of hand, especially about things that you are not an expert in. Dimitri is an expert in nuclear power and physics. You aren't. If you were a truth seeker, you'd listen to what he has to say first, for at least an hour. What if he's right? Did you ever ask yourself that? Why are you so closed minded that you only accept one reality of everything?

If he's right, then Richard Gage is wrong. And if Richard Gage is wrong and you've been sending him money, then your a dumbass. Further, if you send money to Richard Gage, then that means you've made up your mind that there was a conspiracy rather than generally accepted events of that day. And if you've made up your mind there was a conspiracy, then you are not a truth seeker. What goes around comes around and then bites you in the ass Winston.
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: Nuclear demolition of WTC on 9/11 - Dimitri Khalezov

Postby Scepcop » 07 May 2012, 07:34

Skeptics, Shills and Paid Debunkers,

I'd like you to explain this one. A few seconds before the collapse of one of the towers, you can clearly see the ground shake in this video:



From another angle, you can see the same earthquake happen just before collapse:



Now how do you denialists and paid debunkers explain that one? How can you obfuscate or confuse this one? It's obvious proof, no matter how you try to obfuscate it.

Dimitri Khalezov did a four hour TV interview in Europe about the nuclear demolition of the WTC. You can see it here.

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Nuclear demolition of WTC on 9/11 - Dimitri Khalezov

Postby Arouet » 07 May 2012, 07:41

Scepcop wrote:Skeptics, Shills and Paid Debunkers,

I'd like you to explain this one


What's the point? You'll just ignore it anyway. You still haven't responded to the moon hoax thread.
User avatar
Arouet
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 03:07

Re: Nuclear demolition of WTC on 9/11 - Dimitri Khalezov

Postby Scepcop » 07 May 2012, 08:22

Arouet wrote:
Scepcop wrote:Skeptics, Shills and Paid Debunkers,

I'd like you to explain this one


What's the point? You'll just ignore it anyway. You still haven't responded to the moon hoax thread.


In other words, you have no explanation. That's what I figured. You can't obfuscate this one. You are defending something that has a 0.00 percent chance of being true, simply because your job is to debunk everything that challenges the official version of anything and everything, regardless of evidence. You are no truth seeker for sure.

Also, take a look at these initial photos of the Pentagon crash. Does it look at all like a 757 really crashed there? Who could be so stupid as to believe such at thing? Anyone can fake photos of small debris, even an amateur can. But these photos really say it all. If a real 757 crashed there, there would be large pieces of debris and wreckage. Plus of course, no plane can fly at 400mph while 20 feet above ground. It's aerodynamically impossible. So the plane could not fly fast enough to disintegrate, even if that were possible.

Image

Image

Image

What I don't get, is why there are still intelligent educated wise people out there who still buy the official version of 9/11, even though it's been debunked to a zero probability many times over? Isn't that odd? Why is that?

Questions for believers of the official 9/11 story:

1. What is the basis for your belief that authority=truth and that the official version of everything is always correct, no matter what evidence there is for and against, and no matter how many times the government has lied in the past?

2. Why do you take on faith, a source that has constantly lied in the past? Doesn't that defy common sense? The government has even lied about small things like the rescue of Jessica Lynch or the death of Pat Tillman. Haven't you heard of the parable "The Boy Who Cried Wolf"? So why do you believe everything a pathological liar says? Isn't that illogical?

Can you provide a logical explanation for the above two?

Also, in the photos above, does it look to you like a 757 crashed there?
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Nuclear demolition of WTC on 9/11 - Dimitri Khalezov

Postby Arouet » 07 May 2012, 08:57

Scepcop wrote:In other words, you have no explanation. That's what I figured. You can't obfuscate this one. You are defending something that has a 0.00 percent chance of being true, simply because your job is to debunk everything that challenges the official version of anything and everything, regardless of evidence. You are no truth seeker for sure.


Oh, I have no interest in 911 conspiracy and didn't even look at your links. I don't think you can find a post of mine defending any point of view re: 911. I just can't resist an opportunity to remind you that you continually abandon threads when you are posed direct questions.
User avatar
Arouet
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 03:07

Re: Nuclear demolition of WTC on 9/11 - Dimitri Khalezov

Postby Craig Browning » 07 May 2012, 11:03

I have no clue as to what you've being so dramatic about, camera motion can be caused by numerous things, including wind (which there would be, given the large blaze and how it would create a draw through the streets) but there was no Earthquake -- NADA! You guys are grasping at straws when it comes to this claim or if you are suggesting that its due to explosions underground, etc.

Why can't you accept ANYTHING that's offered in way of an official conclusion? Why must everything be part of a conspiracy of some kind?

It would be impossible logistically, let alone all the physical requisites that would have to be kept secret, to pull off the sort of thing you and your fellow mental patients keep insisting "happened". Stop listening to people that echo your assumptions and start looking at the LEGITIMATE sciences behind what was going on. Look at the fact that Osoma was a student of structural engineering and probably had a decent understanding as to what the fire, extra weight of the planes themselves and the additional sway created around the crashes and how it would affect the outcome.

Use some actual mainstream logic and stop it with the hypothetical and outlandish. 9/11 happened as the result of a well planned attack NOTHING MORE! We really did land on the moon and private industry as well as other nations are in the pre-production phase of populating it and quite likely a nearby asteroid within the next 6-10 years, Richard Branson seemingly leading the way.

Look at the very easy to get your hands on public facts and stop believing in the Nursery Rhymes and Grimm Tales.


Oh! I challenge you and your fellow freakazoids to walk over ground zero with radiation detectors and get readings that would prove nuclear discharge. Get the tangible & provable data such as an increase in radiation sickness throughout the NYC areas, cancer in young people (that is related to radiation exposure not the particles of dust many are still having problems with). Sorry, but me thinks thine ass has been talking to you a bit much.
User avatar
Craig Browning
 
Posts: 1526
Joined: 13 Feb 2010, 05:20
Location: Northampton, MA

Re: Nuclear demolition of WTC on 9/11 - Dimitri Khalezov

Postby ProfWag » 07 May 2012, 20:52

Scepcop wrote:Now how do you denialists and paid debunkers explain that one? How can you obfuscate or confuse this one? It's obvious proof, no matter how you try to obfuscate it.


How do you know it wasn't wind shaking the camera? What does the effect of the inside of a 100 story building collapsing before the outside do to the ground underneath? There's two very plausable explanations without even thinking.
Oh, and I wish I were a "paid debunker!"
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Next

Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests