View Active Topics          Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts          Switch to Mobile

736 Eyewitnesses of TWA 800 say FBI altered their testimony!

Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.

Re: 736 Eyewitnesses of TWA 800 say FBI altered their testim

Postby Misha » 01 Feb 2013, 16:53

Misha wrote:Here is a site you guys might want to look at. According to this report 183 witnesses saw a streak of light emanating from the surface in the direction of Flight 800. I have talked with General Ben Partin about TWA Flight 800 years ago. Ben even sent me his report in which he believes the airliner was taken down by continuous-rod exploding missile[s]. Perhaps, the report is on line and you can find it. Please put it up if you do.

http://twa800.com/pages/members.html

Also, Harvard professor Elaine Scarry has an interesting take on events concerning TWA 800, Swiss Air 111, and Egyptian Air Flight 990. Her thesis was on electromagnetic interference concerning Flight 111 and TWA 800 at least.


Hi Guys,

I found the article of Scarry's thesis in the New York Times. Here's an interesting excerpt from that article:

She spent months tutoring herself in EMI. She learned that stray emissions from powerful antennas on the ground or in military planes in the air can disconnect a plane's autopilot, jam equipment, cause electrical short circuits, put a plane into a sudden dive, interrupt fuel flow -- or even trigger on-board explosions. She learned that the U.S. military had "electronic warfare" planes expressly designed to cause these sorts of problems in enemy equipment. She also knew that the military had taken steps to protect its own planes by wrapping them in EMI-resistant materials. Finally, she learned the exact locations of five military craft -- two planes, one Black Hawk helicopter, a Coast Guard cutter and an Aegis cruiser -- that had been within 200 miles of T.W.A. 800 when it fell into the ocean.


It was the U.S.S Normandy conducting exercises within or near Air Corridor Betty" when TWA 800 went down. Interesting.... Also, if you go back and read my posting of Colonel Don de Grand Pre's letter to Vice Chairman Peter Pace about EMP being able to take out a plane's autopilot is thought provoking.

I'll leave it there for the moment. There's more to this which also can be read in Kristina Borjesson's work "Into the Buzzsaw."

http://partners.nytimes.com/library/mag ... carry.html

P.S. Really, do you still have "hope for me?" I'm too far gone. :oops: :shock:
Misha
 
Posts: 438
Joined: 19 Aug 2012, 03:42






Re: 736 Eyewitnesses of TWA 800 say FBI altered their testim

Postby SydneyPSIder » 09 Feb 2013, 07:49

And how about the mystery behind Pan Am Flight 103, or 'the Lockerbie bombing' -- a Boeing 747-100 that crashed over the town of Lockerbie, Scotland on December 21, 1988? A total of 270 people died, including 11 people who lived in the town. Of the victims on board the plane, 189 were from the United States. It was pinned on Libya, but much of the evidence presented was flawed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_Am_Fli ... y_theories

http://plane-truth.com/pan_am_103.htm

http://moraloutrage.wordpress.com/2011/ ... -happened/

http://www.lockerbietruth.com/
SydneyPSIder
 
Posts: 1124
Joined: 10 Sep 2012, 18:24

Re: 736 Eyewitnesses of TWA 800 say FBI altered their testim

Postby Scepcop » 24 Apr 2014, 10:46

Here is an interview on Fox News with the director of a new documentary on the cover up of TWA Flight 800 which features several crash site investigation whistleblowers from the NTSB.



What I don't get is:

1. If a simple wire spark can cause a large airliner to explode, then wouldn't many planes be exploding everyday?

2. Explosions in real life are not as easily and frivolously started as they are in the movies. Cars that crash do not explode like they do in the movies. And if you fired bullets at a gas tank, it would not explode like in the movies. It takes an ignition device to cause an explosion. They don't happen easily and frivolously. Does the FBI expect people to think that explosions easily happen in real life just like in the movies? Explosions in movies are deliberately planned and set up. They do not happen by accident. When was the last time you saw a car explode after crashing? Like never? In fact, when was the last time you saw anything explode by accident?

3. How come 250 people saw a missile hit the plane? The FBI says that those witnesses must have seen the burning plane ascending. But I think people know the difference between a missile and a burning plane. Plus how can a burning plane hit a burning plane? People said they saw a missile hit the plane, not that they saw a burning plane hit a burning plane. In other words, they saw one object hitting another, not just one object by itself. Sheesh.
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: 736 Eyewitnesses of TWA 800 say FBI altered their testim

Postby Misha » 24 Apr 2014, 12:08

SydneyPSIder wrote:And how about the mystery behind Pan Am Flight 103, or 'the Lockerbie bombing' -- a Boeing 747-100 that crashed over the town of Lockerbie, Scotland on December 21, 1988? A total of 270 people died, including 11 people who lived in the town. Of the victims on board the plane, 189 were from the United States. It was pinned on Libya, but much of the evidence presented was flawed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_Am_Fli ... y_theories

http://plane-truth.com/pan_am_103.htm

http://moraloutrage.wordpress.com/2011/ ... -happened/

http://www.lockerbietruth.com/


Outside what I have read I have talked with Susan Lindauer about Pan Am 103. And your right, Sydney. Libya was sacrificed for the cooperation of Arab states in the Gulf War.
Misha
 
Posts: 438
Joined: 19 Aug 2012, 03:42

Re: 736 Eyewitnesses of TWA 800 say FBI altered their testim

Postby Misha » 24 Apr 2014, 12:13

Scepcop wrote:Here is an interview on Fox News with the director of a new documentary on the cover up of TWA Flight 800 which features several crash site investigation whistleblowers from the NTSB.



What I don't get is:

1. If a simple wire spark can cause a large airliner to explode, then wouldn't many planes be exploding everyday?

2. Explosions in real life are not as easily and frivolously started as they are in the movies. Cars that crash do not explode like they do in the movies. And if you fired bullets at a gas tank, it would not explode like in the movies. It takes an ignition device to cause an explosion. They don't happen easily and frivolously. Does the FBI expect people to think that explosions easily happen in real life just like in the movies? Explosions in movies are deliberately planned and set up. They do not happen by accident. When was the last time you saw a car explode after crashing? Like never? In fact, when was the last time you saw anything explode by accident?

3. How come 250 people saw a missile hit the plane? The FBI says that those witnesses must have seen the burning plane ascending. But I think people know the difference between a missile and a burning plane. Plus how can a burning plane hit a burning plane? People said they saw a missile hit the plane, not that they saw a burning plane hit a burning plane. In other words, they saw one object hitting another, not just one object by itself. Sheesh.


Here we go again. I have spoken years ago to General Ben Partin at length about what took down TWA 800. He even sent me his report. It was according to Ben "exploding rod" technology. The red residue which was surreptitiously obtained from the fuselage confirmed it.
Misha
 
Posts: 438
Joined: 19 Aug 2012, 03:42

Previous

Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests