View Active Topics          Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts          Switch to Mobile

Former BBC Presenter Now Admits 9/11 was an Inside Job

Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.

Former BBC Presenter Now Admits 9/11 was an Inside Job

Postby Scepcop » 06 Jan 2011, 03:17

Video and article below.





http://www.infowars.com/top-constructio ... emolition/

Top Construction Firm: WTC Destroyed By Controlled Demolition

Paul Joseph Watson

Respected Middle East expert and former BBC presenter Alan Hart has broken his silence on 9/11, by revealing that the world’s most prominent civil engineering company told him directly that the collapse of the twin towers was a controlled demolition.

Speaking on the Kevin Barrett show yesterday, Hart said he thought the 9/11 attack probably started as a Muslim operation headed up by Osama Bin Laden but that the plot was subsequently hijacked and carried out by Mossad agents in collusion with elements of the CIA, adding that since its formation, Israel has penetrated every Arab government and terrorist organization.

“My guess is that at an early point they said to the bad guys in the CIA – hey this operation’s running what do we do, and the zionists and the neo-cons said let’s use it,” said Hart, making reference to how top neo-cons like Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and their fellow Project For a New American Century authors had called for a “catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor,” the year before 9/11.

“The twin towers were brought down by a controlled ground explosion, not the planes,” said Hart, adding that this view was based on his close friendship with consultants who work with the world’s leading civil engineering and construction firm.

Hart asked the company to study the collapse of the twin towers, after which they told him directly, “There’s absolutely no doubt whatsoever that the towers were brought down by a controlled ground explosion.”

Hart then explained how the five dancing Israelis seen celebrating the attack on the World Trade Center in New Jersey as it unfolded, who turned out to be Mossad agents, proves at at a minimum Israel knew the attack was going to happen. Hart went further in speculating that the planes had been fitted with transponders and that the Israelis were guiding them in to the towers.

Host Barrett pointed out that to carry out the successful controlled demolition of three of the biggest buildings in history, the conspirators would have to ensure that they were hit, making the use of remote controlled airliners a distinct possibility. In addition, Barrett mentioned the fact that he had interviewed numerous pilots who dismissed the chances of accurately guiding a huge commercial airliner into a building while flying at sea level at around 600 miles per hour, especially considering the alleged 9/11 hijackers struggled to even fly basic Cessna light aircraft.

“Sounding a chilling note, Hart added that the U.S. is in grave danger of an Israeli-instigated false-flag nuclear attack, perhaps using an American nuclear weapon stolen from Minot Air Force Base during the “loose nukes” rogue operation of August, 2007. The motive would be to trigger a U.S. war with Iran, and perhaps to finish the ethnic cleansing of Palestine under cover of war–which Hart is convinced the Zionists are planning to do as soon as the opportunity presents itself,” writes host Barratt.

Given his biography and standing, Hart’s comments are not to be taken lightly. Hart is a former Middle East Chief Correspondent for ITN News and has also presented for BBC Panorama specializing in the Middle East. He was also a war reporter in Vietnam and the first journalist to reach Suez Canal with the Israeli army in 1967. Over the decades, Hart has developed close relationships with numerous high profile political figures, including the Shah of Iran, Yasser Arafat and Shimon Peres.

Hart has been a successful author for years and has no reason to fabricate the fact that a top construction firm told him point blank that the towers were brought down in a controlled demolition.

In forwarding this information, Hart joins legions of other credible experts who to some extent or other have all publicly challenged the official 9/11 story, with many outright stating that the attacks were an inside job, people like 20-year decorated CIA veteran Robert Baer, who told a radio host that “the evidence points at” 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job.

In addition, no less than 1198 architectural and engineering specialists have signed a petition demanding Congress re-open an official investigation into the 9/11 attack and the collapse of the twin towers.
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29






Re: Former BBC Presenter Now Admits 9/11 was an Inside Job

Postby derrida » 06 Jan 2011, 09:42

what is that supposed to mean?
former BBC PRESENTER now admits 911 was an inside job?
that doesnt meaaaaaan anything

ADMITS??.. who is him to admit anything?
when bush says it it would mean.. before.. who cares
is just a regular joe with an opinion
he doesnt know..

if wikileaks proved anything is that USA is inept in keeping his secrets
9/11 wasnt an inside job
derrida
 
Posts: 308
Joined: 08 Oct 2010, 04:29

Re: Former BBC Presenter Now Admits 9/11 was an Inside Job

Postby Arouet » 06 Jan 2011, 10:21

Scepcop likes a catchy thread title.
User avatar
Arouet
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 03:07

Re: Former BBC Presenter Now Admits 9/11 was an Inside Job

Postby ProfWag » 06 Jan 2011, 10:27

derrida wrote:what is that supposed to mean?
former BBC PRESENTER now admits 911 was an inside job?
that doesnt meaaaaaan anything

ADMITS??.. who is him to admit anything?
when bush says it it would mean.. before.. who cares
is just a regular joe with an opinion
he doesnt know..

if wikileaks proved anything is that USA is inept in keeping his secrets
9/11 wasnt an inside job

I was thinking the exact same thing derrida.
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: Former BBC Presenter Now Admits 9/11 was an Inside Job

Postby Scepcop » 06 Jan 2011, 19:27

derrida wrote:what is that supposed to mean?
former BBC PRESENTER now admits 911 was an inside job?
that doesnt meaaaaaan anything

ADMITS??.. who is him to admit anything?
when bush says it it would mean.. before.. who cares
is just a regular joe with an opinion
he doesnt know..

if wikileaks proved anything is that USA is inept in keeping his secrets
9/11 wasnt an inside job


Did you even read it? Hart is an insider too, not just a BBC Presenter. He knows some of the elite and has worked with them. He has an integrity record. Plus he spoke to a top construction engineering firm who said that the three WTC towers collapsed from controlled demolition. Read the article for once.

The official explanation is that fire from the jet fuels caused the steel to weaken and buckle, which caused a progressive collapse. However, those are just words. That theory has never been proven in science or any tests with miniature models.

First, steel melts at 2750 degrees F, while office fires can only go up to 1200 F maximum. Second, even if the steel did melt, it still wouldn't go through 300,000 tons of concrete like thin air and pulverize the concrete to dust. A fire collapse is gradual, uneven, and pieces would fall over to the side, not straight down. Third, the third tower, WTC 7 wasn't even hit by a plane, yet it collapsed in 6 seconds.

So, many things don't add up, and the official explanations are just words. They don't hold water if you analyze them.

But for some reason, even highly intelligent people (including some on this forum, you know who you are) have trouble conceiving that such a thing could be a conspiracy. They have some mental block against it.

Image
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Former BBC Presenter Now Admits 9/11 was an Inside Job

Postby ProfWag » 06 Jan 2011, 21:48

Scepcop wrote:But for some reason, even highly intelligent people (including some on this forum, you know who you are) have trouble conceiving that such a thing could be a conspiracy. They have some mental block against it.


I don't know if you're talking about me specifically, but I've never said that 9/11 couldn't be a conspiracy. I've said that the evidence I've seen on both sides points me to the conclusion that it was 19 Muslim terrorists, acting within a terrorist cell with approval from OBL. I have also said point blank that I do believe (you could almost say "know" that the portions of the government knew something like 9/11 was about to happen. As for Alan Hart, his primary duty in life is Zionism so not sure what that has to do with 100 story building collapses.
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: Former BBC Presenter Now Admits 9/11 was an Inside Job

Postby Edx » 07 Jan 2011, 06:07

Scepcop wrote: Plus he spoke to a top construction engineering firm who said that the three WTC towers collapsed from controlled demolition. Read the article for once.


And what a surprise they can't be named.

Would they also be the only demolition company that uses the word "pull" to refer to putting explosives in buildings to blow them up? Why is it truther's can't find any demolition company that uses the word that way?

First, steel melts at 2750 degrees F, while office fires can only go up to 1200 F maximum.


Stop lying Winston! :roll: You've been told over and over again that the steel didn't HAVE to MELT.

Steel softens around 425°C and loses about half of its strength at 650°C. Why do you have to lie if you're really interested in truth?

Second, even if the steel did melt, it still wouldn't go through 300,000 tons of concrete like thin air and pulverize the concrete to dust.


Something like this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwFHEoiUZ7o

Problem is none of those buildings were demolished by explosives. The building itself caused the destruction you see.

A fire collapse is gradual, uneven, and pieces would fall over to the side, not straight down.


It was a series of failures over time. Redudancy keeps the building up until a critical number of columns failed.

Third, the third tower, WTC 7 wasn't even hit by a plane, yet it collapsed in 6 seconds.


No it didn't, what about the other half of the collapse? But you already know all this.

But go on, run away from another thread, I don't expect you back just like every other one.
Edx
 
Posts: 128
Joined: 03 Jul 2010, 03:21


Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests