SCEPCOP Forum

Just to play devil's advocate here, how do you KNOW LBJ was behind THE assassination? Is it not possible that there could have been assassination discussions going on as you suggest, but LHO beat them to the punch and wasn't part of LBJ'S plot (assuming there was one, of course.)? Could there not have been 2,3,4, or more different plots being planned that all left out LHO who did this of his own accord?

Hi ProfWag, My position is clear. LBJ was a cog. A very important cog. Oswald was a patsy.

Agree to Disagree, ProfWag.

ProfWag,

'There's two ways of looking at the idea of understanding:

"One, If you don't look you will never see. And two, If you look a little less you'll might see a helluva lot more.'"

--Tommy lee Jones in the film "Electric Mist."

Hi SydneyPSIder,

There is no doubt that the mob's finger was involved in the assassination of JFK. However, they were nothing but an operational sub-group or at best a limited hangout to the real purveyors behind the murder. It is proven that the CIA and the mob were working together to eliminate Castro. No arguments there. However, there is more than enough information to suggest that there was an unseen hand directing the activities of the mob throughout the entire episode of JFK's administration. Jim Douglass has given what most researchers consider the best overall view on the dynamics behind the assassination. Get the book, please. Below is a pretty good review of Douglass' book.

http://www.ctka.net/2008/jfk_unspeakable.html

Also, to understand Bobby Kennedy's mindset after the assassination, please read David Talbot's - "Brothers." And last but not least, read Douglas P. Horne's - "Inside The ARRB" (Assassination Record Review Board). Horne and the ARRB go to great lengths on how the "State" covered up the assassination of JFK. Something the "mob" could not do.

Misha,
Is it true that on page 1654 of Horne's book, he states the following:?

"One reality that is undeniable is that Lee Harvey Oswald DID NOT KILL PRESIDENT KENNEDY, as proven by George O'Toole in
1975."

If that is true, is that quote above taken out of context or does that pretty much sum up Mr. Horne's conclusion?