SCEPCOP Forum

Why is NASA and Obama now saying that they don't have the technology to go to the moon again and that they don't remember how they did it before? Wouldn't they keep a record of how the greatest achievement in human history was done? You'd think so, wouldn't you?

So today, going to the moon is an impossibility, but in 1969-1972, it was a routine and easy thing they did without any casualties. Uh huh. Yeah right. You buy that?

They can't even take a man 1000 miles above the earth safely today. So how did they take men 240,000 miles to the moon and back before, with no casualties? Why believe everything you hear?

History has never had technology go backwards before. When Charles Lindberg first flew across the Atlantic, they did not suddenly forget how to do it or wait 40 years before trying to repeat it.

Also, if the Apollo 11 mission was the greatest achievement in human history, why did NASA lose the original telemetry tapes?



Finally, the astronauts did NOT move or jump like they were in 1/6 gravity at all.

There are just way too many things that don't add up.

Most people lack the ability to question things, and assume that authority=truth (no matter how many times authority has lied in the past) which is illogical and has no basis. They can't even explain WHY they believe that authority=truth, which indicates that they are programmed.

For starters I personally know at least 3 of the key players of the Apollo program that are still around and I'm positive there are many others, it really wasn't all that long ago. Secondly, there was simply too much documentation on that project world wide, so whoever came up with this lame lie is really out of touch with reality.

The "problem" as I understand it, is that we don't know how to do it without bringing a sense of reprise to the old Apollo type system, which is exceptionally expensive by today's standards. So on many levels we are starting from scratch, looking at alternative launch platforms and exploration systems. There is likewise a new "mission" when it comes to a return to the moon; we're not going to collect rocks & soil samples any longer but to give a serious look at exploiting it for minerals and other "commercial" as well as "scientific" advantages which will ultimately mean populating the lunar surface which brings a massive list of issues, starting with the human body's ability to survive extended periods of time in that low gravity before major health issues start surfacing. We know that those who've spent extended time in zero gravity (space stations) end up with major muscle loss and complication with their internal organ system (digestion) amongst other things; Russia and the U.S. in particular have been working on this problem for decades now with Japan and France offering some very dynamic theories that could take the older ideas tied to artificial gravity generation, many steps forward. . . and their focus has centered on the idea of mining and populating the moon as well as larger asteroids that can be deemed "safe" when it comes to their course of movement, etc.

Sorry, but the Moon Landings Happened! It would be impossible to fake something so massive and International by its very nature.

C'mon Scepcop! Don't hit and run us again? Otherwise what point it there in responding to your posts?

It's another hoax claiming that the moon landings were hoaxes. You'd think that after all of this time the hoaxers would become more sophisticated. But nnnnnoooooooooooooooooooo! That's asking too much.

Guess it was another hit and run by Scepcop. Why post if you're not going to discuss? Well, fool me twice....

Yeah, that's the kicker. If we don't respond he'll say the skeptics have no answer. if we do respond, he ignores it then comes back and reposts the same thing a few months down the road.

Tell a Lie Big Enough and Often Enough and it becomes "true" . . . ask the Church elders or most any Politician, Lawyer, Minister, Cult Leader . . .

Check out this incredible 3.5 hour documentary called "What happened on the moon?" It features experts in photography and videography showing incontrovertible evidence that many of the photos and videos of the moon were clearly faked and had a second artificial light source - there's no way around it. Some whistleblowers are also mentioned, including one source that says that Apollo 15 Astronaut James Irwin was about to go public about the moon hoax before he suddenly collapsed of a heart attack.

After viewing this film objectively, there will be no doubt in your mind that the whole thing was a fake, lie and cover up.

Here are parts 1 and 2.

Can I get a showing of hands as to who is going to waste 3 and a half hours of their day watching this rhetoric?

Scepcop actually returns to the thread but doesn't address previous questions directed at him. Anyone surprised?

The real question is: what is Scepcop trying to hide?

That could be seen as being quite naughty. . .