Moon Landing Hoax - Evidence, Logic and Common Sense

[SydneyPSIder]

6 parts to 'Was It Only A Paper Moon?'





This one is very interesting at 7:55 -- people who think NASA personnel are not in on the scam in the past and present can observe 'Alan Nadell's' 'Adele's' (sp?) behaviour, and the Frank Hughes character referenced throughout. There is some further footage somewhere where Alan gives Jim the bum's rush for asking about the hatch measurement. See also 11:54 and the problem with hypergolic fuel but no dark red smoke from the lunar lander.






The bum's rush footage is here also at the very end of the doco, at 11:29:

[SydneyPSIder]

BELOW: This next NASA fake comes courtesy of Apollo 15. In most movie sets, the crew will take a picture of the set to try and frame it correctly before they start shooting with film. The same thing here. It's just that some absent minded photographer forgot and left the polaroids on the leg of the lunar module.......dohhhh!



By the way, if you think the photos left on the lunar lander are just weird reflections from the gold Reynolds Wrap, photo expert Jack White shows you how you can tell the difference:



BELOW: We think the photographers for Apollo 16 need to frame their phony pictures better. You can clearly see 6 studio lights at the top of this "Lights Camera, Action" picture.



BELOW: Every one of these pictures is of Buzz Aldrin from Apollo 11. Apparently he can't figure out how he wants to dress. In some pictures his moon suit is tucked into his moon boots, in some they are not. In some pictures his gloves are white, in some they're grey. Some pictures he has an antenna...and some he doesn't. One picture shows him wearing a black arm band...and it disappears in others.

[The23rdman]

Regarding there being diffused light on the moon: I can't see anything other than harsh light in any published photo. Show me one with diffused light, please.

[NinjaPuppy]

I've removed all the extraneous posts from this topic and put them here: viewtopic.php?f=12&t=2645&start=0.

Now here's the thing. If you don't like the way a discussion is going, then start your own danged topic and specify the terms and conditions in the OP. If you have something of value to add in an already started topic, then by all means add it but don't whine about how others want to discuss a topic.

[SydneyPSIder]

[NinjaPuppy]

[Misha]

Can anyone enlarge the astronaut's face plate on this photograph? SydenyPSIder, did you pick this up on your own or did you find this in another researcher's research? Also, could this photo be taken from a tripod to be clear? Did the astronauts at any time take pictures not using their chest cameras? Let's be sure and cover all bases.

[SydneyPSIder]

[Misha]

[ProfWag]

[ProfWag]

[Misha]

Thanks, ProfWag. My confusion. Actually, I think Syd was doing the "punking" which I look forward to his reply.

http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infoc ... 297170.jpg

[The23rdman]

Thanks Prof. Yes, I had found the same evidence for photoshopping.

[Misha]

Since everyone is throwing around the word "punked" or "punking" I thought it best to find out what you fellas mean by this. I'm from New York and it means only one thing:

1. punking

1. a male prison inmate blank another male prison inmate in the ass
2. succesfully playing a practical joke on someone

Originally, the word "punk" was prison slang, meaning the first defintion. the second comes from the idea that blank someone in the ass is a sign of disrespect (such as male dogs humping one another to show dominance, instead of sexual attraction, which could very well be the motive behind prison rape as well)
"here come' bubba, you 'bout to get f'd in the a' ok?"

Now I haven't been to prison and I also don't find the same sex attractive. What gives?

[Arouet]

Misha: its the practical joke version, made popular by Ashton Kutcher's MTV show:

http://www.mtv.com/shows/punkd/series.jhtml