Moon Landing Hoax - Evidence, Logic and Common Sense

[SydneyPSIder]

[Misha]

[Misha]

[ProfWag]

[ProfWag]

[SydneyPSIder]

[SydneyPSIder]

[Misha]

[SydneyPSIder]

Misha, I think you and I just have to accept that ProfWag has a strong faith-based belief system and set of allegiances that cloud his public utterances, if not his internal judgement, and move on.

[SydneyPSIder]

Evidence of NASA 'touching up' pics -- different 'shades of black' under computer analysis:



http://www.aulis.com/allen_bis.htm

Did I publish the light globe computer analysis image earlier?



http://www.aulis.com/jackimages/as12sunbulbrevise.jpg



http://www.aulis.com/jackimages/11_14sunsetonmoon.jpg

Note that NASA took down the pic which demonstrates a light bulb after the computer analysis was published. Who says the govt, military and NASA aren't reading the 'wacky CT websites' that ProfWag rejects?

[Misha]

ProfWag,

Here is a very good example of how secrets are kept through compartmentalization. Fast forward to 45 minutes and listen to Thomas Drake talk about how only a few knew of "Stellar Wind" and the rest of the NSA was out of the loop.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04s1UU_gsd0

That is how secrets are kept. And whistle-blowers are a very, very rare breed. Thomas Drake was one out of thirty thousand employees at NSA.

Now for Apollo our national identity was at stake. The level of embarrassment would have been much higher than this NSA infraction. Now, how many in the know will go there?

Now as Cliff Robertson had said in "Three Days of The Condor" - "How do you know they'll print it?"

So in essence, I am saying this:

"Papa Dragon, here. I want this mission high and tight. I want to be back home for dinner."

[SydneyPSIder]

ProfWag has declared himself blinkered, overwrought and out of the running to review or discuss any evidence due to patriotic conflicts of interest, in his customary manner, so maybe one of the remaining pseudosceps who haven't disqualified themselves might want to discuss the evidence, and attempt to apply logic and common sense in their arguments to refute, say, the stereoscopic studies?

[SydneyPSIder]

[Misha]

[ProfWag]