Expert Pilots say Flight 77 maneuvers impossible on 9/11

[Scepcop]

[ProfWag]

I feel the need to point out that I am quoted above as saying "skeptics are not thinkers..." That has been incorrectly shown as my post when, in fact, it was Scepcop's quote...
Thanks

[Scepcop]

Look at these photos below and tell me if this scene looks like an area where a 757 crashed into. These are the initial photos immediately after the crash. Forget those photos of small debris on the floor, which an amateur could have photoshopped, that conspiracy debunkers like to point to as proof. These photos that capture the scene immediately after the crash are a lot more indicative and speak LOUDER than anything else.

[NinjaPuppy]

[ProfWag]

[SydneyPSIder]

Scepcop is right, pseudosceptics are wrong...

[SydneyPSIder]

[ProfWag]

[SydneyPSIder]

[ProfWag]

Could you remind us again Syd where the original plane with the 59 people on board are? Oh yea, and when you give us that location, I'd like to see some evidence of that please. Thanks.

[SydneyPSIder]

[Misha]

Last edited by Misha on 03 Oct 2012, 03:05, edited 1 time in total.

[ProfWag]

[SydneyPSIder]

When you rule out the impossible (757 hitting the Pentagon), only the improbable is left. Why should I be privy to the machinations of the govt and military on that day? There are plenty of accounts and theories out there of what happened to Flight 77, you should go and look them up. There were a strangely high number of Boeing engineers and other professionals from the military-industrial complex listed on that flight, plus the odious Olson character. One account suggests 75% of passengers on ALL flights were Pentagon-related. There are also many accounts of why the impact was suspicious, including the way the 'rescue' was handled and cleaned up -- including playing water on what was supposed to be a jet fuel fire, denial of access of medical rescue helicopters, failure to call in nearby military fire-fighting units, failure to deal with the fire properly to maximise survivor rescue, failure by the Pentagon to protect Washington DC airspace at all while knowing 'something' was approaching after the WTC had been hit -- including ongoing stand-down orders, etc etc. Then there is the lack of wreckage, no luggage or plane passenger bodies, confiscated footage, a 16ft hole from a 45ft tailplane, and 2 6-ton engines not making any impact. These are all parts of the real, observable 'evidence' that we CAN access. Whether the passengers were transferred off the flight or just killed I don't know -- this information is hardly published in the public domain by the perpetrators, now is it? It amazes me that you insist on direct evidence and proof and omniscience about something that is meant to be kept secret at all costs -- all that can be provided are reasonable theories to explain the anomalies.

Here's one account: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/socio ... 11_20a.htm
Some contributors to that author from civilian and military aeronautical backgrounds suggest that it was not a 757, and most likely a Tomahawk cruise missile with a hardened bunker-busting warhead to penetrate multiple ring walls. Other possibilities include a small Learjet type aircraft.

[Arouet]