9/11 debate on C2C I consulted on for Richard Gage

[Scepcop]

One new stunning argument I read in Stundie's refutation of Dave Thomas' 6 points, which I hadn't thought of before, is this:

If a few office fires burning for a few hours can bring down a whole steel skyscraper and pulverize it, why would control demolition companies need to spend MONTHS setting up rigged explosives around the core columns, when they could accomplish their task by burning jet fuel (ala WTC1+2) or gas (ala WTC7) for just a few hours? In other words, why spend months doing what you can accomplish in a few hours, which even a teenager could do? It doesn't make sense! The demolition companies would be out of business if that was true!

Likewise:

If the failure of a single column can cause a 47 story building to implode and land mostly in it's own footprint, as NIST claims, then why do demolition companies rig and blow all the columns to accomplish the same thing?

See below

[Edx]

[Scepcop]

[Edx]

[really?]

[Edx]

[stundie]

[stundie]

[stundie]

[Edx]

Last edited by Edx on 13 Jul 2010, 21:26, edited 14 times in total.

[Edx]

[NinjaPuppy]

[Edx]

[NinjaPuppy]

[Edx]