View Active Topics          Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts          Switch to Mobile

9/11 debate on C2C I consulted on for Richard Gage

Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.

Re: 9/11 debate on C2C I consulted on for Richard Gage

Postby SydneyPSIder » 27 Sep 2012, 08:31

This is a 2 YEAR conversation in slow mo?

The buildings collapsed rapidly at near free fall speeds indicating a lack of structural support from top to bottom. The only conceivable way this could happen given modern construction methods and the properties of steel frame buildings is if the buildings connecting joints were weakened from top to bottom beforehand.

I think there is very little evidence of a 'DEW' weapon, there is little evidence that such a weapon even exists, and the same result can be obtained with good ol' explosives and the placement of shearing thermite devices. Thermite was used for silence to cut through bolts holding the frames together every 10m, or 3 storeys, which is why the building collapsed into neat 10m sections of steel, the length they were manufactured in. This process took place for about an hour after 'impact' (or initial explosions in the basements to weaken the foundational structures timed on the impacts) and evacuation of the buildings. Then a second set of small C-4 charges were detonated to actually cause the weakened beams to fly out and collapse the building.

As posted on the other active thread:



I think the DEW arguments are not supported well by the facts or realism and are a crank argument, used possibly to introduce FUD, or else the proponents really are harmless cranks.
SydneyPSIder
 
Posts: 1124
Joined: 10 Sep 2012, 18:24






Re: 9/11 debate on C2C I consulted on for Richard Gage

Postby ProfWag » 27 Sep 2012, 20:49

SydneyPSIder wrote: The only conceivable way this could happen given modern construction methods and the properties of steel frame buildings is if the buildings connecting joints were weakened from top to bottom beforehand.

Sorry, couldn't disagree with you more on your statement.
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: 9/11 debate on C2C I consulted on for Richard Gage

Postby SydneyPSIder » 28 Sep 2012, 14:14

ProfWag wrote:
SydneyPSIder wrote: The only conceivable way this could happen given modern construction methods and the properties of steel frame buildings is if the buildings connecting joints were weakened from top to bottom beforehand.

Sorry, couldn't disagree with you more on your statement.

Disagree all you want, but your opinions are devoid of technical knowledge or understanding.
SydneyPSIder
 
Posts: 1124
Joined: 10 Sep 2012, 18:24

Re: 9/11 debate on C2C I consulted on for Richard Gage

Postby ProfWag » 28 Sep 2012, 20:55

SydneyPSIder wrote:
ProfWag wrote:
SydneyPSIder wrote: The only conceivable way this could happen given modern construction methods and the properties of steel frame buildings is if the buildings connecting joints were weakened from top to bottom beforehand.

Sorry, couldn't disagree with you more on your statement.

Disagree all you want, but your opinions are devoid of technical knowledge or understanding.

Are they really? I wouldn't know since you never post anything more than opinions rather than solid evidence or even a reference. As far as I, and the rest of the readers know, all you do is go out on conspiracy sites and post things that agree with your beliefs. Hardly technical knowledge or understanding on your part.
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Previous

Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests