9/11 debate on C2C I consulted on for Richard Gage

[Scepcop]

Hi all,
Richard Gage of AE911Truth.org and a team of scientists are scheduled to debate a team of JREF debunkers on the Coast to Coast program in the next few months. Gage has put me on the mailing list after reading my suggestions to him in how to debate the JREF crowd and which points to emphasize, because he would like me to be a consultant to his team. I am honored of course.

Anyhow, there isn't an exact date yet for this debate because when teams of people are involved, it is difficult to coordinate schedules that fit everyone. But I'll keep you all posted if I know any set dates.

Thanks,
Winston

[NinjaPuppy]

CONGRATS!

[caniswalensis]

Sounds like the big leagues! That is exciting, and even as a skeptic, I do not blame you for being honored.

I wish for intellectual clarity for all the participants.

Regards, Canis

[Scepcop]

Hi everyone,
I just got word from Richard Gage that the Coast to Coast debate between his team of scientists and the JREFers about 9/11 will take place on July 31st, sometime in the evening. So please feel free to listen in. I think you can listen in either on your AM radio station or the coast to coast website. http://www.coasttocoastam.com/

On the JREF side, we only know that someone named Dave Thomas will be on it. The rest of his team are unknown at this point. But a possibility is that the infamous Mark Roberts may join them, who is quite an intimidating monster. lol

I spoke to Richard on the phone and gave him some insights and key strategies for exposing the JREFers and their kind.

[ProfWag]

Hi everyone,
I just got word from Richard Gage that the Coast to Coast debate between his team of scientists and the JREFers about 9/11 will take place on July 31st, 10:00am to 2:00am PST. So please feel free to listen in. I think you can listen in either on your AM radio station or the coast to coast website. http://www.coasttocoastam.com/

On the JREF side, we only know that someone named Dave Thomas will be on it. The rest of his team are unknown at this point. But a possibility is that the infamous Mark Roberts may join them, who is quite an intimidating monster. lol

I spoke to Richard on the phone and gave him some insights and key strategies for exposing the JREFers and their kind.

I'll admit, I'm anxious already! Don't forget to remind us!!!!

[Scepcop]

Hi everyone,
I just got word from Richard Gage that the Coast to Coast debate between his team of scientists and the JREFers about 9/11 will take place on July 31st, 10:00am to 2:00am PST. So please feel free to listen in. I think you can listen in either on your AM radio station or the coast to coast website. http://www.coasttocoastam.com/

On the JREF side, we only know that someone named Dave Thomas will be on it. The rest of his team are unknown at this point. But a possibility is that the infamous Mark Roberts may join them, who is quite an intimidating monster. lol

I spoke to Richard on the phone and gave him some insights and key strategies for exposing the JREFers and their kind.

I'll admit, I'm anxious already! Don't forget to remind us!!!!

Just mark it on your calendar, whether it's paper or digital. lol

Even if you miss it, I'm sure it'll be uploaded on YouTube.

[Scepcop]

Check out who Richard Gage and his team will be debating. He seems to have a lot of credentials.

• Mr. Dave Thomas is a physicist and mathematician. He received bachelor degrees in mathematics and in physics, and a master of science in mathematics, from the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, where he was awarded the Brown Medal and the Langmuir Award. Dave is president of the science group New Mexicans for Science and Reason (http://www.nmsr.org), and also is a Fellow of CSI (Committee for Skeptical Inquiry), the publishers of Skeptical Inquirer.

• Other individuals – to be named

[ProfWag]

Check out who Richard Gage and his team will be debating. He seems to have a lot of credentials.

• Mr. Dave Thomas is a physicist and mathematician. He received bachelor degrees in mathematics and in physics, and a master of science in mathematics, from the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, where he was awarded the Brown Medal and the Langmuir Award. Dave is president of the science group New Mexicans for Science and Reason (http://www.nmsr.org), and also is a Fellow of CSI (Committee for Skeptical Inquiry), the publishers of Skeptical Inquirer.

• Other individuals – to be named

If your theories about 9/11 are solid, then you shouldn't have any problem Scepcop!
I still can't wait. I know it will be a hoot!

[really?]

At first glance reading the subject line and the posts and that this debate would be on C to C I dismissed as more pandering to strange unproven ideas and not worth the time to listen too, but after going to the link nmsr.org I see this debate on C to C should be very entertaining.

[ProfWag]

So how's the consulting going Scepcop? Have you been able to help out Mr. Gage?

[Scepcop]

So how's the consulting going Scepcop? Have you been able to help out Mr. Gage?

Well yeah. I talked to him on the phone for an hour and gave him some suggestions and arguments to use. He seems to be more worried about the format of the debate than the content though, whereas I care more about the content.

Remember though, I'm not actually IN the debate. I'm just a consultant on it. The team will consist of scientists. On our team will also be Kevin Ryan, Neils Harritt (from Denmark) and others.

This should be good, yes, to have team vs. team. It will be like watching a sport. Or to me, it will be like the Justice League or Superfriends vs. The Legion of Doom. hahaha

It's too bad ciscop isn't here. He would love the group that Dave Thomas is president of, New Mexicans for Science and Reason (http://www.nmsr.org), since ciscop is mexican too. Why is it "new mexicans" though? Is there referring to Mexico or the state of New Mexico?

[NinjaPuppy]

New Mexico, the state.

[ProfWag]

But why would you need to worry about content if your theories are solid?

[Scepcop]

But why would you need to worry about content if your theories are solid?

What don't you get? The theories or hypothesis rather ARE the content. It should be the focus. Why do you ask dumb questions just to be anal and difficult? It's like you guys have no common sense.

[really?]

But why would you need to worry about content if your theories are solid?

What don't you get? The theories or hypothesis rather ARE the content. It should be the focus. Why do you ask dumb questions just to be anal and difficult? It's like you guys have no common sense.

Well yeah. I talked to him on the phone for an hour and gave him some suggestions and arguments to use. He seems to be more worried about the format of the debate than the content though, whereas I care more about the content.

You said; [ above ↑] you were worried about the content and PW was asking you what specifically about the content is causing your concern. He because your statement above is vague.