SCEPCOP Forum

Still waiting for your source for why you believe that NASA and Obama have said that they have forgotten the technology for getting back to the moon.

not to mention how easily they could literally push themselves into lunar orbit. . .

One of the biggest fears of NASA as well as the astronauts was just that; getting to enthusiastic and bouncing up and away from things. I believe that they deliberately added weight to the boots of the suits so as to purposely slow down foot & leg action for this reason; even the rover had certain safeties tied into its dune-buggie design, that would guard against a never-ending Evel Knievel moment.

I'd love to know what the GPA was for all these shit-stirring brainiacs when they were in college . . . if they made it that far. Then too, who amongst them has a credible reputation in the field that have given reasonably sound data based on their specialties and area of work, to support this particular Conspiracy issue?

I've yet to see any such person involved and I'm betting that most of the "experts" had exceptionally low GPAs with a fair number of these nut jobs fitting the Jeff Foxworthy descriptive of being a "Red Neck" a.k.a. trailer trash with barely a High School diploma to speak of.

The real mystery, at least for me, is how supposedly educated and intelligent people get sucked into all this crap?

Check out my new report with 50+ logical conspiracy arguments. It covers 9/11, JFK and the Moon Landings.

http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/Conspiracies.htm

Check out this great new interview with Bart Sibrel on Coast to Coast AM. He's the famous moon hoax filmmaker who was punched by Buzz Aldrin and discovered the smoking gun footage of the Apollo 11 crew faking a video shot of being halfway to the moon when they were really in Earth orbit, which is very damning evidence if not ironclad proof of the moon hoax.



Here is another great interview with him by a guy who agrees with him.

http://www.erichufschmid.net/Interview- ... ibrel.html

Apollo defenders claim that the flag flutters on the moon because the astronauts are twisting the pole. But in many clips, they are barely moving it at all yet the flag flutters sharply. Here is one example. As you can see, there is no twisting of the pole and very little movement, yet the corner of the flag is fluttering up sharply.



There is also video clips of the Apollo astronauts where you can see wires attached to them from above. Here are some video stills where you can see the wires attached to them.





In short, there is very little solid evidence that we went to the moon, and A LOT of evidence that we didn't. This means the evidence that the moon missions were a hoax heavily OUTWEIGH the little or no evidence that we went. People seem to only believe it out of faith, emotion and pride.

I'm having to type with just my left hand so I apologize up front if my post contains grammar errors or is abbreviated.

Here is the fallacy in the moon hoax debate that none of the CTers here will admit. Let's say for a minute that absolute proof that the films from the moon were faked (they weren't, but let's pretend they were). Does that mean we didn't actually go to the moon or would that just prove we didn't have the ability to send live coverage back to earth and NASA wanted to give the people of the world a view of what it was like there? I'll answer for you since I know you won't. NO! Fake video is absolutely NO proof that we didn't go there. Without "faked" video, what other evidence do you have that we never went there?











'
'
'

So all you did Syd was rehash the camera footage which I pointed out does nothing towards proving we didn't go to the moon. How about some evidence we didn't go? Oh, you don't have any eyewitnesses from the thousands involved at NASA who say it was a hoax or you don't have any mathematical or scientific data to show it was not possible? I didn't think so...